PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 122% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus PRIME H310M-E R2.0/BR (all builds) |
Memory | 9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20200422 |
Uptime | 0.5 Days |
Run Date | Mar 27 '21 at 22:49 |
Run Duration | 160 Seconds |
Run User | BRA-User |
Background CPU | 15% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-9700KF-$218
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
|
89.9%
Excellent
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
Gigabyte(1458 400C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
122%
Outstanding
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
579GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 340 396 386 413 419 423 MB/s
|
121%
Outstanding
|
|||
Sandisk Extreme SSD 500GB
455GB free
Firmware: 1012
SusWrite @10s intervals: 304 213 236 150 198 199 MB/s
|
56.7%
Above average
|
|||
Amd-raid WDC WDS480G2G0A- 480GB
349GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UG400400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 89 142 147 117 118 MB/s
|
118%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate ST1000VM002-1CT162 1TB
571GB free
Firmware: SC23
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 141 141 141 143 141 MB/s
|
79%
Very good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Micron AFLD416ES1P 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
30.6%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-9400FIntel $96Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 457x |
Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 222x |
Core i5-9400Intel $161Bench 86%, 22,187 samples | 38x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 108x |
GTX 1660Nvidia $143Bench 68%, 230,793 samples | 83x |
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 67x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 78% - Very good | Total price: $279 |