RM ONE 310

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	27.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	53.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	RM ONE 310 (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel DQ67OW
Memory	3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111111
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Apr 10 '21 at 17:30
Run Duration	217 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	24%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SKTH, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	67.9% Good	Memory 83.6 1-Core 83.6 2-Core 165 66% 111 Pts	4-Core 302 8-Core 303 40% 303 Pts	64-Core 298 18% 298 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 67.9% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199 77,943 User benchmarks, average bench 27% Gigabyte(1458 2272) CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.3.1 Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	27.9% Poor	Lighting 35.7 Reflection 39.1 Parallax 47.5 29% 40.8 fps	MRender 33 Gravity 34.9 Splatting 27.1 26% 31.7 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 27.9% Great: 29%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 29GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 284 38 39 41 41 42 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	53.9% Above average	Read 378 Write 324 Mixed 234 SusWrite 80.9 57% 254 MB/s	4K Read 25.8 4K Write 42.3 4K Mixed 30.2 100% 32.8 MB/s	DQ Read 35.5 DQ Write 76 DQ Mixed 43.4 36% 51.6 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 53.9% Great: 108%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59 47,815 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 70GB free Firmware: JP2OA50E SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 121 122 122 122 122 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	59.5% Above average	Read 86.6 Write 79.9 Mixed 49.2 SusWrite 121 62% 84.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 123% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 59.5% Great: 74%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 16GB 16,813 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 11GB free, PID 6544 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 4.8 3.9 3.8 4 4.2 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	5.75% Terrible	Read 26.7 Write 3.7 Mixed 7.7 SusWrite 4.3 11% 10.6 MB/s	4K Read 4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 15% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.75% Great: 9%
Generic External 1TB 83 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 463GB free, PID 3960 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 14 12 13 9.6 13 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	8.78% Terrible	Read 14 Write 11.2 Mixed 13.7 SusWrite 12.2 17% 12.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.4 59% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 8.78% Great: 75%
UFD USB Drive 16GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 11GB free, PID 6200 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.9 6.1 6.9 6.2 7.2 5.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	8.07% Terrible	Read 28.3 Write 13.8 Mixed 11.9 SusWrite 6.7 18% 15.2 MB/s	4K Read 2.8 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 1.2 72% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.07% Great: 33%
Flash Disk 3.0 2TB 482 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 2TB free, PID 1234 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 17 14 17 11 17 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	7.03% Terrible	Read 21.2 Write 5.7 Mixed 8.2 SusWrite 15 15% 12.5 MB/s	4K Read 2.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 11% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 7.03% Great: 14%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB 9,902 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 1GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.9 3.9 4.1 3.6 3.1 4.3 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	4.07% Terrible	Read 18.4 Write 8.2 Mixed 2.5 SusWrite 3.6 9% 8.17 MB/s	4K Read 2.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 10% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.07% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5584-010.A00LF 2x4GB 1,931 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	45.1% Average	MC Read 15.9 MC Write 16.3 MC Mixed 14.3 44% 15.5 GB/s	SC Read 12 SC Write 12.6 SC Mixed 13.9 37% 12.8 GB/s	Latency 74.1 54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 45.1% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ONE 310 Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: RM ONE 310

CPU
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples	9x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	8x
Core i3-2120Intel $170Bench 51%, 77,810 samples	6x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	8x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	3x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	3x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	3x
Series SATA SSD 240GBVBench 70%, 4,398 samples	3x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	3x

RAM
HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 51%, 8,612 samples	3x
M2F2G64CB88G7N-CG 2x2GBNanyaBench 41%, 409 samples	3x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 26% - Poor

Total price: $90

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $23	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16