Asus EX-H110M-V

Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	40.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	25.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus EX-H110M-V (all builds)
Memory	8.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160921
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 15 '21 at 08:19
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	IDN-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7400-$70 234,266 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	76.5% Very good	Memory 82.4 1-Core 107 2-Core 199 74% 130 Pts	4-Core 409 8-Core 408 55% 409 Pts	64-Core 410 25% 410 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 76.5% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% PowerColor(148C 2378) CLim: 1215 MHz, MLim: 1950 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.3.2 Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	40.2% Average	Lighting 47.4 Reflection 58.7 Parallax 76.1 39% 60.7 fps	MRender 60.2 Gravity 59.8 Splatting 42.4 43% 54.1 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 40.2% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Midasforce 240GB 240GB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 80GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2002XKR SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 34 1 49 38 16 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	25.3% Poor	Read 349 Write 61.8 Mixed 18.9 SusWrite 31.5 25% 115 MB/s	4K Read 20.5 4K Write 7 4K Mixed 0.5 35% 9.33 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 25.3% Great: 72%
Seagate ST1000VM002-1CT162 1TB 39,407 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 207GB free Firmware: SC23 SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 168 168 165 168 170 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	89.2% Excellent	Read 144 Write 150 Mixed 70.4 SusWrite 168 97% 133 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 89.2% Great: 98%
Generic Mass-Storage 8GB 1,181 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 1GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.6 6.8 6.9 6.8 6.9 7 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	6.97% Terrible	Read 14.7 Write 6.2 Mixed 10 SusWrite 7 12% 9.48 MB/s	4K Read 3.6 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 1.2 81% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 6.97% Great: 10%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB 60,539 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 7GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 5.6 4.9 5 4.8 4.8 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	10.9% Very poor	Read 38 Write 5.7 Mixed 10 SusWrite 4.9 15% 14.7 MB/s	4K Read 6.6 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 2.7 147% 3.4 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 10.9% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX2400C15/4G Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G6H1 12GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2400, 2400 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	45.9% Average	MC Read 16.4 MC Write 16.1 MC Mixed 14.2 44% 15.6 GB/s	SC Read 13.1 SC Write 16.5 SC Mixed 13.8 41% 14.5 GB/s	Latency 76.3 52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 45.9% Great: 72%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EX-H110M-V Builds (Compare 344 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus EX-H110M-V

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $70Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	82x
Core i3-7100Intel $40Bench 57%, 79,299 samples	73x
Pentium G4560Intel $31Bench 57%, 70,054 samples	56x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	51x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	45x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	37x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	19x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	12x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	9x

RAM
Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 1x8GBTeamBench 41%, 3,973 samples	7x
2x4GBAdataBench 60%, 13,050 samples	5x
Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBTeamBench 88%, 35,395 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $157

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406