Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 41% Speed boat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	5.46% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	19.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon 5140 168 User benchmarks, average bench 39% XU1 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.35 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	42.3% Average	Memory 68.7 1-Core 26.3 2-Core 49.4 34% 48.1 Pts	4-Core 94.7 8-Core 97.1 13% 95.9 Pts	64-Core 101 6% 101 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 42.3% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7570 12,360 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Dell(1028 2B20) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	5.46% Terrible	Lighting 7 Reflection 7.6 Parallax 5.8 6% 6.8 fps	MRender 7.2 Gravity 5.3 Splatting 5.9 5% 6.13 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.46% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung RBX Series 1 128GB 26 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 101GB free (System drive) Firmware: VAM0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 49 54 63 63 68 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	19.8% Very poor	Read 96.3 Write 25.7 Mixed 39.5 SusWrite 54.4 12% 54 MB/s	4K Read 18.1 4K Write 5.6 4K Mixed 9.2 42% 11 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 19.8% Great: 20%
Win 160GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 149GB free Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 114 113 114 114 114 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	63% Good	Read 105 Write 115 Mixed 64.7 SusWrite 114 73% 99.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 1.2 226% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 63% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 41GB 2,583 User benchmarks, average bench 17% null MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 33792 MB Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	17.9% Very poor	MC Read 5.5 MC Write 5.2 MC Mixed 6.5 16% 5.73 GB/s	SC Read 3.1 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 4.6 12% 4.33 GB/s	Latency 104 38% 104 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 17.9% Great: 23%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E53451stBench 41%, 462 samples	15x
CPU: Intel Xeon 51601stBench 43%, 632 samples	10x
CPU: Intel Xeon 51601stBench 43%, 235 samples	7x

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	6x
Quadro FX 4600NvidiaBench 4%, 1,222 samples	3x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	3x

SSD
SKC600MS256G 256GBKingstonBench 93%, 190 samples	3x
INTENSO 240GBBench 77%, 887 samples	3x
60GB 60GBSSDBench 49%, 267 samples	2x