Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 43% Speed boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	10.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo T9550-$199 1,427 User benchmarks, average bench 39% Microprocessor, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	43.7% Average	Memory 76 1-Core 38.7 2-Core 53.6 40% 56.1 Pts	4-Core 69.2 8-Core 72.5 9% 70.8 Pts	64-Core 72.1 4% 72.1 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 2700M 788 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Dell(1028 019B) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01 Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	3.33% Terrible	Lighting 4.3 Reflection 1.8 Parallax 1.2 4% 2.43 fps	MRender 5.9 Gravity 2.4 Splatting 3.1 3% 3.8 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.33% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung RBX Series 1 128GB 26 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 70GB free (System drive) Firmware: VAM0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 31 38 37 38 41 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	10.5% Very poor	Read 63.4 Write 24.5 Mixed 32.4 SusWrite 35.4 9% 38.9 MB/s	4K Read 8 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 4.4 20% 5.2 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 10.5% Great: 20%
Hitachi HTS723225L9A362 250GB 173 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 225GB free Firmware: FCDO SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 65 65 65 65 65 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	40.4% Average	Read 75.5 Write 75.2 Mixed 42.9 SusWrite 65 48% 64.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 40.4% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	17.6% Very poor	MC Read 5.5 MC Write 4.8 MC Mixed 5.2 15% 5.17 GB/s	SC Read 5.7 SC Write 5.2 SC Mixed 5 15% 5.3 GB/s	Latency 88.2 45% 88.2 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 17.6% Great: 45%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Extreme Q9300Intel $219Bench 46%, 660 samples	14x
Core2 Duo T9600Intel $170Bench 39%, 2,726 samples	11x
Core2 Duo T9550Intel $199Bench 39%, 1,427 samples	8x

GPU
Quadro FX 2700MNvidiaBench 3%, 788 samples	30x
Quadro FX 3700MNvidiaBench 6%, 383 samples	20x
FirePro M7740ATIBench 7%, 225 samples	6x

SSD
Fury 240GBHyperX $65Bench 71%, 27,826 samples	2x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	2x
RBX Series 1 128GBSamsungBench 15%, 26 samples	2x

Value: 41% - Average

Total price: $284