Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-Z97X-UD5H-BK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics3.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z97X-UD5H-BK  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150919
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateApr 23 '21 at 21:41
Run Duration225 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670-$100
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Memory 93.5
1-Core 108
2-Core 216
80% 139 Pts
4-Core 413
8-Core 423
56% 418 Pts
64-Core 409
25% 409 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.27% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 6.4
3% 4.23 fps
MRender 7.2
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 4.8
4% 4.83 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.27%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ZA480NM10001 480GB
392GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SF44011J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 101 104 99 102 102 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 302
Write 224
Mixed 249
SusWrite 99.7
49% 219 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 52.4
4K Mixed 33.4
112% 37.6 MB/s
DQ Read 181
DQ Write 141
DQ Mixed 92.4
88% 138 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$34
654GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 97 97 91 96 97 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Read 176
Write 173
Mixed 79.2
SusWrite 95.8
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.2
251% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$34
517GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 162 158 144 140 133 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 143
Mixed 76.2
SusWrite 149
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.5
119% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
2TB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 180 179 180 180 182 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 146
Mixed 86.2
SusWrite 178
108% 147 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 103%
Great: 114%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$67
962GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 132 133 133 133 133 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
73.2% Very good
Read 122
Write 123
Mixed 73.3
SusWrite 133
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 84%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
121GB free
Firmware: CC4D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 119 118 120 120 120 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Read 135
Write 110
Mixed 85.7
SusWrite 119
83% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 112%
Seagate ST16000NE000-2RW103 16TB
9.5TB free
Firmware: EN02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 155 158 173 159 160 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 30% Great: 86%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$22
466GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 109 109 117 116 117 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
66.8% Good
Read 119
Write 116
Mixed 59.9
SusWrite 114
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.8
129% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 69%
Seagate BUP Slim SL 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 123 122 126 127 129 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
69.9% Good
Read 118
Write 132
Mixed 72.2
SusWrite 125
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
225% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
62% Good
MC Read 22
MC Write 22.7
MC Mixed 19.5
61% 21.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 20.6
SC Mixed 19.1
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 60.9
66% 60.9 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 62%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z97X-UD5H-BK Builds (Compare 495 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z97X-UD5H-BK - $206

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $893
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback