Today's hottest deals

Asrock Z77 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics12.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive58.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory1.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120910
Uptime4 Days
Run DateAug 15 '22 at 17:11
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$70
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Memory 89
1-Core 111
2-Core 224
80% 141 Pts
4-Core 433
8-Core 339
54% 386 Pts
64-Core 366
23% 366 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4000
Nvidia(10DE 097C) 3GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1404 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 472.84
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
12.7% Very poor
Lighting 14.3
Reflection 18.6
Parallax 19.4
12% 17.4 fps
MRender 22
Gravity 18.4
Splatting 15.1
15% 18.5 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 133 99 98 100 95 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
58.7% Above average
Read 236
Write 223
Mixed 214
SusWrite 122
45% 199 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 47.9
4K Mixed 32.7
106% 35.4 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 191
144% 193 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 124%
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
12GB free
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 245
Write 213
Mixed 189
48% 216 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 41.4
4K Mixed 19.9
74% 26.4 MB/s
DQ Read 184
DQ Write 72.8
DQ Mixed 109
86% 122 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 76%
WD WD7500AACS-00D6B0 750GB
38GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 53 54 53 53 54 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
27.2% Poor
Read 41
Write 43.3
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 53.1
31% 42.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 46%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 2TB
13GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 179 180 160 156 143 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 250
Write 200
Mixed 67.9
SusWrite 162
124% 170 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 1.6
385% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 119%
Great: 213%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32% Below average
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 9.2
29% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 10.3
SC Mixed 8.6
27% 9.33 GB/s
Latency 68.5
58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 4,179 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 - $154

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $504
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback