Gigabyte GA-Z87X-UD3H-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	35.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	44% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte Z87X-UD3H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z87X-UD3H-CF (all builds)
Memory	5.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit 种颜色, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140117
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 29 '21 at 06:40
Run Duration	276 Seconds
Run User	CHN-User
Background CPU	29%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770-$75 176,321 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	70.5% Very good	Memory 81.4 1-Core 93.7 2-Core 173 68% 116 Pts	4-Core 322 8-Core 494 50% 408 Pts	64-Core 504 31% 504 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 70.5% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279 116,895 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Gigabyte(1458 3603) 2GB CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 466.11 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	35.1% Below average	Lighting 40.8 Reflection 36.8 Parallax 48.8 33% 42.1 fps	MRender 54.1 Gravity 51 Splatting 40.3 39% 48.5 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 35.1% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 830 256GB-$261 25,763 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 113GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM03B1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 97 114 111 103 107 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	44% Average	Read 298 Write 170 Mixed 161 SusWrite 104 41% 183 MB/s	4K Read 15.7 4K Write 35.1 4K Mixed 20.4 68% 23.7 MB/s	DQ Read 143 DQ Write 52.4 DQ Mixed 84.5 66% 93.2 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 44% Great: 86%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 145GB free Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 44 43 42 40 38 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile)	25.5% Poor	Read 326 Write 57.3 Mixed 99.1 SusWrite 41.6 28% 131 MB/s	4K Read 22.4 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 1.7 37% 8.37 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 25.5% Great: 133%
Toshiba DT02ABA400 4TB 531 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 128GB free Firmware: KQ000A SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 80 80 82 82 82 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	14.2% Very poor	Read 182 Write 170 Mixed 70.2 SusWrite 80.6 28% 126 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 7.7 4K Mixed 0.6 7% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.2% Great: 21%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 158 163 171 174 173 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	90.7% Outstanding	Read 150 Write 155 Mixed 78.2 SusWrite 166 100% 137 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 1 214% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 90.7% Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 551GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 73 77 81 85 90 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	54.5% Above average	Read 107 Write 122 Mixed 76 SusWrite 82.8 72% 97 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0 59% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 54.5% Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$114 34,353 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 351GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 111 115 116 124 110 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	78.7% Very good	Read 160 Write 156 Mixed 51.2 SusWrite 114 88% 120 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.5 114% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 78.7% Great: 105%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 95GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 100 105 106 105 104 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	49.6% Average	Read 69.2 Write 99.2 Mixed 65.9 SusWrite 104 62% 84.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0 68% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 49.6% Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 58GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.7 9.6 9.8 9.7 9.7 9.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	14.2% Very poor	Read 39.6 Write 10.4 Mixed 22.7 SusWrite 9.7 15% 20.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.2 76% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 14.2% Great: 90%
External USB3.0 DISK04 4TB 43 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 580GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 142 159 160 141 162 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	57.6% Above average	Read 65.6 Write 111 Mixed 80.9 SusWrite 151 149% 102 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 4.8 4K Mixed 0.5 188% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 57.6% Great: 64%
External USB3.0 DISK02 4TB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 646GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 8.6 3.2 3.7 5.9 6.9 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	33.8% Below average	Read 123 Write 146 Mixed 111 SusWrite 6.8 127% 96.8 MB/s	4K Read 5.6 4K Write 4.3 4K Mixed 0.7 191% 3.53 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 33.8% Great: 66%
External USB3.0 DISK00 4TB 80 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 118GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 147 160 160 145 163 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	68.3% Good	Read 136 Write 154 Mixed 111 SusWrite 154 191% 139 MB/s	4K Read 6.1 4K Write 4.4 4K Mixed 0.6 193% 3.7 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 68.3% Great: 77%
External USB3.0 DISK03 4TB 69 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 51GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 2.9 0.9 0.8 1 0.8 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	20% Poor	Read 104 Write 63 Mixed 57.6 SusWrite 2.1 66% 56.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 74% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 20% Great: 80%
External USB3.0 DISK01 4TB 73 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 43GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.1 2.8 0.8 0.8 1 0.9 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	20.8% Poor	Read 119 Write 91.4 Mixed 76 SusWrite 2 88% 72 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.6 57% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 20.8% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99P5471-039.A00LF 2x8GB 65 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	29.1% Poor	MC Read 9.9 MC Write 10.1 MC Mixed 8.1 27% 9.37 GB/s	SC Read 8.4 SC Write 9.3 SC Mixed 8.3 25% 8.67 GB/s	Latency 77.9 51% 77.9 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 29.1% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z87X-UD3H-CF Builds (Compare 935 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z87X-UD3H-CF

CPU
Core i7-4770KIntel $120Bench 74%, 172,887 samples	366x
Core i5-4670KIntel $62Bench 68%, 128,482 samples	223x
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	111x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	99x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	71x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	69x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	54x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	30x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	28x

RAM
RipjawsX DDR3 1866 C9 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 54%, 8,026 samples	28x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 49%, 28,220 samples	25x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 43,127 samples	24x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $215

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16