Today's hottest deals

Asrock H67M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics0.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock H67M  (all builds)
Memory3.5 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130125
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 29 '21 at 07:38
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Memory 86.6
1-Core 76.5
2-Core 157
64% 107 Pts
4-Core 342
8-Core 355
46% 348 Pts
64-Core 336
21% 336 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
ASRock(1849 0102) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.88% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 0.7
1% 1.07 fps
MRender 1.6
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 1.2
1% 1.23 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.88%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Revuahn 900G Blue 120GB
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1211A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 404 374 404 410 407 408 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Read 469
Write 395
Mixed 308
SusWrite 401
88% 393 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 91.3
4K Mixed 16.8
106% 44 MB/s
DQ Read 86.7
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 27.2
75% 150 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 M378B5273DH0-CH9 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
48.4% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 14
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 13.4
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H67M Builds (Compare 172 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H67M - $104

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $350
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback