Today's hottest deals

Asus P8P67 REV 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics34.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8P67 REV 3.1  (all builds)
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110328
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 07 '21 at 00:38
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Memory 92.4
1-Core 115
2-Core 228
83% 145 Pts
4-Core 452
8-Core 453
60% 453 Pts
64-Core 442
27% 442 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
Zotac(19DA 3255) 2GB
CLim: 1215 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
34.4% Below average
Lighting 40.1
Reflection 37.9
Parallax 51.4
33% 43.1 fps
MRender 53.7
Gravity 49
Splatting 39.1
38% 47.3 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Revuahn 900G Blue 120GB
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0929A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 197 125 80 39 44 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 331
Write 217
Mixed 255
SusWrite 100
50% 226 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 68.4
4K Mixed 0.5
71% 30.6 MB/s
DQ Read 151
DQ Write 140
DQ Mixed 38.3
58% 110 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 84%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$18
273GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 114 121 122 122 122 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Read 127
Write 116
Mixed 63.3
SusWrite 119
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173EB0-CK0 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
57.3% Above average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 17.7
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 16
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 63.2
63% 63.2 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 21.5" 1280 701 SAM09C4 S22C450
Typical P8P67 REV 3.1 Builds (Compare 567 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 REV 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $546
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback