Today's hottest deals

Asus H87M-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics56.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus H87M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131030
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 10 '17 at 11:34
Run Duration96 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670K-$100
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Memory 90
1-Core 111
2-Core 217
80% 139 Pts
4-Core 414
8-Core 395
54% 404 Pts
64-Core 409
25% 409 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$144
Asus(1043 85B0) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 382.33
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
56.9% Above average
Lighting 69.9
Reflection 69.5
Parallax 61.3
57% 66.9 fps
MRender 72
Gravity 66
Splatting 69.7
57% 69.2 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$35
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC46 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
42.1% Average
Read 77.6
Write 68.9
Mixed 25.9
42% 57.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 1.04
4K Mixed 0.3
74% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905402-532.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
51.4% Above average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 15.8
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 15.2
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 67.3
59% 67.3 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H87M-PLUS Builds (Compare 633 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H87M-PLUS - $128

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $243
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback