Fujitsu CELSIUS R970power

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive170% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS R970power  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3488-A2
Memory246.8 GB free of 256 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit väriä, 3840 x 1200 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200128
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateMay 03 '21 at 11:13
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Silver 4214R
CPU1, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Memory 72.7
1-Core 103
2-Core 210
71% 128 Pts
4-Core 397
8-Core 656
64% 526 Pts
64-Core 2999
186% 2999 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 78%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
270GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXA7301Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 645 644 635 640 642 637 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
170% Outstanding
Read 1,358
Write 1,305
Mixed 975
SusWrite 640
240% 1,070 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 73.5
4K Mixed 37.5
134% 47.5 MB/s
DQ Read 663
DQ Write 933
DQ Mixed 270
352% 622 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 170%
Great: 296%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 7.5TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 131 134 130 136 128 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
20% Poor
Read 47.7
Write 184
Mixed 138
SusWrite 131
29% 125 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 8.2
4K Mixed 2.3
33% 9.13 MB/s
DQ Read 39.8
DQ Write 8.9
DQ Mixed 4.2
8% 17.6 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 20%
Great: 417%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A4K40DB2-CVF 8x31.9GB
8 of 16 slots used
255GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.1% Below average
MC Read 19
MC Write 9.3
MC Mixed 13.1
39% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 6.8
23% 8.07 GB/s
Latency 95.2
42% 95.2 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS R970power Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS R970power

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $162
Intel Core i5-12400F $119Nvidia RTX 4070 $499WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $393
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback