Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 143%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 158%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics182% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock X570 Phantom Gaming X  (all builds)
Memory57.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201022
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 05 '21 at 19:43
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 32%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Memory 65.9
1-Core 137
2-Core 249
81% 151 Pts
4-Core 505
8-Core 965
87% 735 Pts
64-Core 1,623
100% 1,623 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$625
Nvidia(10DE 1467) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 466.27
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
182% Outstanding
Lighting 263
Reflection 239
Parallax 295
214% 266 fps
MRender 297
Gravity 218
Splatting 161
177% 225 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 182%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$92
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,668
Write 1,235
Mixed 1,016
289% 1,306 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 70.5
4K Mixed 43.5
145% 49.3 MB/s
DQ Read 910
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 452
380% 569 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
Intel 750 Series NVMe PCIe 400GB-$550
311GB free
Firmware: 8EV10135 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 780 832 781 721 735 888 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
153% Outstanding
Read 898
Write 857
Mixed 551
SusWrite 790
174% 774 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 89
4K Mixed 35.1
134% 50.5 MB/s
DQ Read 994
DQ Write 277
DQ Mixed 541
423% 604 MB/s
Poor: 123%
This bench: 153%
Great: 230%
LSI MR9260-8i 16TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 2.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 291 261 248 253 310 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
35.5% Below average
Read 356
Write 174
Mixed 125
SusWrite 267
51% 230 MB/s
4K Read 8.9
4K Write 6
4K Mixed 1.2
18% 5.37 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3000 C16 Series 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
67.7% Good
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 25.2
MC Mixed 23.7
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 22.7
54% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 137%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X570 Phantom Gaming X Builds (Compare 230 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 171%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 195%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $1,495
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback