bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colori, 1080 x 1732 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160405
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 05 '21 at 20:58
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$235
CPU #000, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
30% Below average
Memory 18.8
1-Core 85.3
2-Core 194
48% 99.5 Pts
4-Core 237
8-Core 233
32% 235 Pts
64-Core 271
17% 271 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 30%
Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 537GB
500GB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 260 227 13 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
42.3% Average
Read 402
Write 245
Mixed 280
SusWrite 89.6
56% 254 MB/s
4K Read 13.1
4K Write 18.6
4K Mixed 14.2
48% 15.3 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 66.1
DQ Mixed 93.6
79% 119 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 95%
Vmware Virtual disk 998GB
929GB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 574 628 650 579 577 589 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Vmware Virtual disk 64GB
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 24 25 23 19 26 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 159
Write 105
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 22.5
64% 87.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.3
115% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 94%
Vmware Virtual disk 4.5TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 57 59 47 53 55 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38% Below average
Read 77.8
Write 79.2
Mixed 69.8
SusWrite 54.1
52% 70.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 38%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x16GB
1 of 128 slots used
16GB DIMM DRAM
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
60.6% Good
MC Read 25.1
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 23.2
67% 23.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 20.2
SC Mixed 10.7
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 329
12% 329 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,457 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $26Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback