MSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 99%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive122% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B79
MotherboardMSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)  (all builds)
Memory28 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210203
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 05 '21 at 21:17
Run Duration238 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$285
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Memory 68
1-Core 160
2-Core 315
95% 181 Pts
4-Core 608
8-Core 1,084
102% 846 Pts
64-Core 1,501
93% 1,501 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.27
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 128
Reflection 141
Parallax 129
105% 133 fps
MRender 116
Gravity 133
Splatting 117
100% 122 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 102%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90
158GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 427 461 460 377 397 189 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 481
Mixed 402
SusWrite 385
99% 441 MB/s
4K Read 42.7
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 59.2
200% 71.1 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 370
278% 371 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 122%
Great: 134%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$159
684GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2456 2149 1183 1201 1200 1201 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
344% Outstanding
Read 2,537
Write 2,416
Mixed 1,759
SusWrite 1,565
464% 2,069 MB/s
4K Read 64.8
4K Write 165
4K Mixed 90.7
302% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 1,327
DQ Write 1,049
DQ Mixed 1167
879% 1,181 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 344%
Great: 372%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$47
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 110 109 111 112 113 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
62.5% Good
Read 111
Write 117
Mixed 58.4
SusWrite 107
72% 98.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 62%
Seagate Barracuda Green 1.5TB-$130
478GB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 103 104 105 106 105 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 81.3
Write 84.1
Mixed 55.1
SusWrite 104
60% 81.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
113% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 69%
General USB Flash Disk 16GB
15GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.5 8 8.8 7.3 8.3 8.5 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
6.08% Terrible
Read 18.5
Write 4.2
Mixed 6
SusWrite 7.9
10% 9.15 MB/s
4K Read 7.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
26% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.08%
Great: 15%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.8% Good
MC Read 28.2
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 27.1
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 22.6
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 27
65% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79) Builds (Compare 4,921 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $488
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback