Acer Aspire V3-771

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemAcer Aspire V3-771  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer VA70_HC
Memory29.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit,
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20131021
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 12 '17 at 18:53
Run Duration258 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
63.4% Good
Memory 83
1-Core 89.7
2-Core 179
68% 117 Pts
4-Core 244
8-Core 312
36% 278 Pts
64-Core 321
20% 321 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Acer(1025 0686) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.75% Terrible
Lighting 4.2
Reflection 5.88
Parallax 2.88
3% 4.32 fps
MRender 4.86
Gravity 2.33
Splatting 7.91
4% 5.03 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.75%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ACSC4M512mSA 507GB
338GB free
Firmware: O1026A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Read 514
Write 389
Mixed 442
100% 449 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 48
4K Mixed 16.3
76% 28 MB/s
DQ Read 228
DQ Write 291
DQ Mixed 15.7
80% 178 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 97%
Intel 520 Series 240GB-$139
155GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 400i Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Read 513
Write 223
Mixed 312
77% 349 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 47.3
4K Mixed 13.6
80% 28.6 MB/s
DQ Read 25.4
DQ Write 48.6
DQ Mixed 88.4
53% 54.1 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 95%
C400-mtf DDAK128MAM 128GB
52GB free
Firmware: 8104
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 41% Great: 60%
Seagate Backup+ BL 1TB
349GB free
Firmware: 0143
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Read 93.8
Write 93.6
Mixed 95.1
71% 94.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.33
86% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 59%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$45
258GB free
Firmware: AX003J Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
44.8% Average
Read 73.4
Write 82.9
Mixed 56.4
53% 70.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.25
4K Write 1.27
4K Mixed 0.14
50% 0.55 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 62%
UFD 3.0 Silicon-Power16G 16GB
15GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Read 42.9
Write 26.9
Mixed 24
37% 31.3 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 0.66
4K Mixed 0.56
58% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 29%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5428-018.A00LF ACR16D3LS1KBG/8G 99U5428-018.A00LF ACR16D3LS1KBG/8G 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
53.6% Above average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 16.6
53% 18.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 17.7
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 75.2
53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire V3-771 Builds (Compare 819 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire V3-771

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback