Today's hottest deals

Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics20.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV R4.0  (all builds)
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200716
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 08 '21 at 02:49
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 200GE-$70
AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Memory 72.8
1-Core 97.2
2-Core 171
66% 114 Pts
4-Core 271
8-Core 272
36% 271 Pts
64-Core 271
17% 271 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 260X-$120
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1600 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 21.4.1
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
20.9% Poor
Lighting 25.7
Reflection 28.1
Parallax 33.6
21% 29.1 fps
MRender 24.8
Gravity 26.2
Splatting 25.6
21% 25.5 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 76 75 78 102 89 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
59% Above average
Read 261
Write 97.2
Mixed 185
SusWrite 82.6
35% 156 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 80.6
4K Mixed 33.2
126% 46.8 MB/s
DQ Read 94.7
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 104
80% 108 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 59%
Great: 73%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80
176GB free
Firmware: 3.AAK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 0 0 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
23.9% Poor
Read 69.9
Write 53.8
Mixed 44.2
SusWrite 12.9
34% 45.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
129% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 43%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$57
98GB free
Firmware: 40.00A40
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 103 103 103 104 104 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 92.5
Write 93
Mixed 61.9
SusWrite 103
64% 87.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
207% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2666 C16 Series 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
51.4% Above average
MC Read 19.3
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 15.4
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 16.5
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 95.1
42% 95.1 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 6,235 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $355
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback