MSI H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics15.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C09
MotherboardMSI H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09)  (all builds)
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200609
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 08 '21 at 11:15
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100F-$115
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Memory 80.3
1-Core 129
2-Core 258
85% 156 Pts
4-Core 516
8-Core 476
67% 496 Pts
64-Core 501
31% 501 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
AMD(1002 0B04) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1183 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.9.1
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Lighting 16.7
Reflection 27.5
Parallax 22.1
14% 22.1 fps
MRender 25.3
Gravity 16.1
Splatting 24.8
18% 22.1 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Turbox 256GB 256GB
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1127B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.3 2.8 30 8.5 32 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
27.6% Poor
Read 411
Write 54.6
Mixed 27.4
SusWrite 20.3
27% 128 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 7.5
4K Mixed 1.1
37% 9.77 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 92%
WD Blue 2.5" 750GB-$73
252GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 55 54 51 55 56 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
37.5% Below average
Read 76.5
Write 52.9
Mixed 41.5
SusWrite 54.1
41% 56.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.1
39% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4 16GB 2666MHz 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
42% Average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 11.5
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 13.2
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 79.9
50% 79.9 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 42%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09) Builds (Compare 6,461 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $339
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback