Asrock B450M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.79% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock B450M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181105
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 08 '21 at 16:13
Run Duration201 Seconds
Run User MKD-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
70.3% Very good
Memory 71.8
1-Core 95.4
2-Core 192
67% 120 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 675
63% 522 Pts
64-Core 988
61% 988 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 3800
Device(18BC 3812) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
5.79% Terrible
Lighting 7.2
Reflection 10.2
Parallax 2.3
6% 6.57 fps
MRender 7.5
Gravity 3.3
Splatting 9.1
6% 6.63 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.79%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SX6000LNP 128GB
119GB free
Firmware: V9002s45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 435 448 444 444 446 447 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
151% Outstanding
Read 1,355
Write 443
Mixed 292
SusWrite 444
139% 634 MB/s
4K Read 39.3
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 49
180% 65.8 MB/s
DQ Read 232
DQ Write 412
DQ Mixed 274
222% 306 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 151%
Great: 197%
SSD 240GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 469
Write 292
Mixed 321
80% 361 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 74.2
4K Mixed 30.2
124% 44.9 MB/s
DQ Read 199
DQ Write 309
DQ Mixed 169
152% 226 MB/s
Poor: 45% Great: 95%
Toshiba HDWD240 4TB
119GB free
Firmware: KQ000A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 50 89 56 69 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
5.53% Terrible
Read 42.7
Write 36
Mixed 30.6
SusWrite 57.2
9% 41.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.2
1% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 5.53%
Great: 20%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
92GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 131 134 134 134 135 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
77.4% Very good
Read 137
Write 142
Mixed 31
SusWrite 133
80% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 107%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61
100GB free
Firmware: MX4OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 156 141 121 100 148 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
74.5% Very good
Read 122
Write 118
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 137
72% 99.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
148% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 108%
WD WD5000ABYS-01TNA0 500GB-$80
407GB free
Firmware: 12.01C01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 79 79 79 80 80 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
45.7% Average
Read 79.8
Write 80.7
Mixed 57.6
SusWrite 78.8
55% 74.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
177% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 47%
ASMT 2115 500GB
17GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 63 62 63 63 63 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
28.1% Poor
Read 56.2
Write 63.5
Mixed 43.9
SusWrite 62.5
78% 56.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
101% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 240%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown< BLS8G4D32AESBK.M8FE Adata 16GB
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
88.7% Excellent
MC Read 35.9
MC Write 34.7
MC Mixed 29.3
95% 33.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 28.4
SC Mixed 20.8
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 97.3
41% 97.3 ns
Poor: 89%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450M Pro4 Builds (Compare 8,964 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock B450M Pro4 - $79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $427
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback