Acer Aspire V7-482PG

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics8.08% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive72.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire V7-482PG  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Polaris_HW
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130829
Uptime11.3 Days
Run DateMay 10 '21 at 04:06
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4200U-$281
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Memory 84.2
1-Core 70.4
2-Core 116
57% 90.2 Pts
4-Core 177
8-Core 177
24% 177 Pts
64-Core 177
11% 177 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 750M
Acer(1025 079C) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.2531
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
8.08% Terrible
Lighting 9.6
Reflection 9.5
Parallax 11.8
8% 10.3 fps
MRender 8.4
Gravity 13
Splatting 10
9% 10.5 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.08%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
117GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 342 201 48 45 44 43 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Read 415
Write 386
Mixed 323
SusWrite 121
70% 311 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 51.4
4K Mixed 35.7
118% 39 MB/s
DQ Read 286
DQ Write 250
DQ Mixed 224
180% 253 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 126%
Asmt ASM105X 500GB
465GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 21 20 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Read 28.7
Write 12.5
Mixed 18.9
SusWrite 20.2
15% 20.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
68% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6MFR6A-PB HMT451S6MFR8A-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
52.2% Above average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 17.1
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 16.6
42% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire V7-482PG Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire V7-482PG

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $281
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback