Today's hottest deals

QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory15.6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 15.6GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory13.3 GB free of 15.625 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 12 '21 at 11:50
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1245 v3
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Memory 74.3
1-Core 95.8
2-Core 179
67% 116 Pts
4-Core 367
8-Core 506
55% 436 Pts
64-Core 521
32% 521 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K600
Nvidia(10DE 094B) 1GB
CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 353.30
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.25% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 5.2
Parallax 4.5
3% 4.47 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 4
Splatting 4.6
4% 4.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.25%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 129GB
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 23 26 22 28 27 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 22% Great: 63%
Qemu HARDDISK 480GB
238GB free
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 207 144 252 227 181 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
42.3% Average
Read 315
Write 355
Mixed 282
SusWrite 206
65% 290 MB/s
4K Read 12.5
4K Write 18.6
4K Mixed 14.2
47% 15.1 MB/s
DQ Read 53.1
DQ Write 56.3
DQ Mixed 51.1
39% 53.5 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x15GB
1 of 1 slots used
15GB DIMM RAM
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.1% Average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 14.9
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 16.6
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 91.7
44% 91.7 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 151%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 618 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback