Today's hottest deals

QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics43.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory9.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 24 '20 at 10:07
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Memory 81.1
1-Core 62.6
2-Core 123
55% 88.9 Pts
4-Core 208
8-Core 330
33% 269 Pts
64-Core 343
21% 343 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$170
CLim: 1281 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.4.1
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.9% Average
Lighting 51.3
Reflection 65.1
Parallax 84.2
42% 66.9 fps
MRender 64
Gravity 61.8
Splatting 52.7
48% 59.5 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 64GB
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 67 56 57 29 33 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 30% Great: 85%
Qemu HARDDISK 250GB
98GB free
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 285 299 302 303 303 303 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
71.4% Very good
Read 427
Write 327
Mixed 340
SusWrite 299
78% 348 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 28.1
4K Mixed 25.2
84% 25.9 MB/s
DQ Read 228
DQ Write 215
DQ Mixed 250
180% 231 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 95%
Qemu HARDDISK 480GB
192GB free
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 275 300 234 85 86 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Read 439
Write 301
Mixed 334
SusWrite 178
70% 313 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 28.5
4K Mixed 17.4
70% 22.4 MB/s
DQ Read 107
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 114
95% 135 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x12GB
1 of 1 slots used
12GB DIMM RAM
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.8% Average
MC Read 20
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 17.4
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 8.1
SC Mixed 12.5
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 78.6
51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 618 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback