Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 55% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2640M 12,152 User benchmarks, average bench 54% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	56.4% Above average	Memory 78.2 1-Core 85.2 2-Core 121 59% 94.7 Pts	4-Core 200 8-Core 213 27% 206 Pts	64-Core 210 13% 210 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 56.4% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz) 110,588 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Dell(1028 0493) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	1.92% Terrible	Lighting 2.2 Reflection 2.4 Parallax 1.6 2% 2.07 fps	MRender 2.3 Gravity 2.7 Splatting 2.8 2% 2.6 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.92% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteonit LAT-256M2S 256GB 534 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 89GB free (System drive) Firmware: PNDA SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 220 219 219 208 200 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	39.3% Below average	Read 287 Write 210 Mixed 218 SusWrite 214 52% 232 MB/s	4K Read 8.6 4K Write 23.4 4K Mixed 11.4 40% 14.5 MB/s	DQ Read 70.6 DQ Write 38.4 DQ Mixed 43.2 35% 50.7 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 39.3% Great: 56%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 04CB AD73I1C1674EV 8GB 110 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	47% Average	MC Read 17.1 MC Write 17.1 MC Mixed 15.7 48% 16.6 GB/s	SC Read 10.6 SC Write 14.4 SC Mixed 12.3 36% 12.4 GB/s	Latency 83.9 48% 83.9 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 47% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	1,632x
NVS 4200MNvidiaBench 2%, 6,825 samples	355x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	158x

RAM
M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 43%, 15,815 samples	76x
M471B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 37%, 7,983 samples	73x
HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 43%, 6,386 samples	64x

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $62

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16