Toshiba SATELLITE L50D-B

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 19% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 17.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE L50D-B (all builds)
Motherboard	AMD Larne
Memory	4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140724
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 19 '21 at 23:56
Run Duration	151 Seconds
Run User	ARG-User
Background CPU	26%

PC Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A6-6310 APU R4 Graphics 10,893 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Socket FT3b, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	17.9% Very poor	Memory 27.8 1-Core 14.5 2-Core 28.1 16% 23.5 Pts	4-Core 47.9 8-Core 49.7 6% 48.8 Pts	64-Core 46.2 3% 46.2 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 17.9% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R4 19,746 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Toshiba(1179 F925) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	0.44% Terrible	Lighting 0.3 Reflection 1.4 Parallax 0.5 0% 0.73 fps	MRender 1.1 Gravity 0.4 Splatting 1.4 1% 0.97 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.44% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$28 142,801 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 64GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR041 SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 95 62 52 85 87 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	36.3% Below average	Read 373 Write 310 Mixed 295 SusWrite 98.8 60% 269 MB/s	4K Read 15.2 4K Write 11.4 4K Mixed 6.4 37% 11 MB/s	DQ Read 106 DQ Write 94.6 DQ Mixed 28.5 41% 76.5 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 36.3% Great: 92%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT51264BF160B.C16F Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 8GB 199 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	14% Very poor	MC Read 5.6 MC Write 3.7 MC Mixed 5.3 14% 4.87 GB/s	SC Read 3.2 SC Write 3.6 SC Mixed 5.3 12% 4.03 GB/s	Latency 268 15% 268 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14% Great: 55%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SATELLITE L50D-B Builds (Compare 41 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 32%

Sail boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE L50D-B

CPU
A8-6410 APU R5 GraphicsAMDBench 32%, 19,683 samples	20x
A6-6310 APU R4 GraphicsAMDBench 33%, 10,893 samples	9x
A4-6210 APU R3 GraphicsAMDBench 30%, 5,378 samples	8x

GPU
Radeon R5AMDBench 2%, 40,685 samples	20x
Radeon R4AMDBench 2%, 19,746 samples	9x
Radeon R3 GraphicsAMDBench 2%, 6,021 samples	8x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	4x
MX500 250GBCrucial $40Bench 101%, 77,177 samples	2x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	1x

RAM
M471B1G73QH0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 40,451 samples	13x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 38,580 samples	7x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 30,873 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 32% - Below average

Total price: $38

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16