Gigabyte GA-AX370M-DS3H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte AX370M-DS3H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AX370M-DS3H-CF  (all builds)
Memory21.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200702
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 21 '21 at 00:27
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
72.1% Very good
Memory 63.3
1-Core 117
2-Core 244
75% 141 Pts
4-Core 434
8-Core 735
71% 584 Pts
64-Core 1,049
65% 1,049 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.47
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
107% Outstanding
Lighting 134
Reflection 112
Parallax 127
109% 124 fps
MRender 174
Gravity 128
Splatting 104
107% 135 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 107%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXY73H1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1256
Write 1,086
Mixed 746
228% 1,029 MB/s
4K Read 46.4
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 63.5
212% 74.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,109
DQ Write 1008
DQ Mixed 860
699% 992 MB/s
Poor: 126% Great: 259%
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$58
38GB free
Firmware: UF450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 216 51 88 3.3 17 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
50.9% Above average
Read 436
Write 348
Mixed 242
SusWrite 82.4
62% 277 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 41.1
4K Mixed 18.5
79% 27.3 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 86.5
DQ Mixed 12.9
34% 72.6 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 55%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
14GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 420
Write 398
Mixed 377
89% 398 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 52.7
4K Mixed 54.8
148% 46.8 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 359
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61
183GB free
Firmware: MX4OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 137 151 157 157 153 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Read 151
Write 146
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 150
87% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
150% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
63.3% Good
MC Read 25.1
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 25.4
65% 22.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 22.8
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AX370M-DS3H-CF Builds (Compare 786 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370M-DS3H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $344
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback