Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	4.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	28.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium G2030-$24 18,277 User benchmarks, average bench 49% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	48.2% Average	Memory 69.9 1-Core 82.2 2-Core 145 58% 99.1 Pts	4-Core 155 8-Core 160 21% 158 Pts	64-Core 163 10% 163 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 48.2% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9800 GT 19,550 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Device(0000 0000) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.81 Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	4.85% Terrible	Lighting 6.5 Reflection 8.7 Parallax 2.5 5% 5.9 fps	MRender 6.5 Gravity 5.2 Splatting 3.5 4% 5.07 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 4.85% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk S128G 126GB 21,984 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 84GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.2.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 118 169 168 180 164 MB/s Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	28.8% Poor	Read 174 Write 122 Mixed 71.4 SusWrite 156 29% 131 MB/s	4K Read 13 4K Write 10 4K Mixed 9.4 37% 10.8 MB/s	DQ Read 32 DQ Write 14.7 DQ Mixed 13.9 13% 20.2 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 28.8% Great: 56%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston C1G40-0001-QBEX. 8GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	48.1% Average	MC Read 16.9 MC Write 17.6 MC Mixed 16.1 48% 16.9 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 14.9 43% 14.9 GB/s	Latency 102 39% 102 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 48.1% Great: 48%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 54%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	209x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	63x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	49x

RAM
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	24x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	23x
CMV4GX3M1A1333C9 Kingston 99U5474-025.A00LF 6GBUnknownBench 37%, 26 samples	16x

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $83

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16