Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 71% Battleship	Desktop 98% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 79% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	69.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	328% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	50 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201124
Uptime	24.1 Days
Run Date	May 29 '21 at 00:57
Run Duration	317 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	14%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395 197,342 User benchmarks, average bench 88% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	92.8% Outstanding	Memory 78.4 1-Core 143 2-Core 290 91% 170 Pts	4-Core 574 8-Core 1,068 98% 821 Pts	64-Core 2,040 126% 2,040 Pts
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 92.8% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% EVGA(3842 2066) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 461.92 Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	69.4% Good	Lighting 83.4 Reflection 106 Parallax 70.9 68% 86.9 fps	MRender 105 Gravity 98.1 Splatting 69.5 72% 90.9 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 69.4% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 666GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1549 1372 1440 1361 1412 1430 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	328% Outstanding	Read 2,437 Write 2,383 Mixed 1,795 SusWrite 1,428 451% 2,011 MB/s	4K Read 62.4 4K Write 166 4K Mixed 89.5 297% 106 MB/s	DQ Read 1,223 DQ Write 1078 DQ Mixed 1,155 864% 1,152 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 328% Great: 410%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$74 114,373 User benchmarks, average bench 277% 460GB free Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1979 1733 1733 1730 1728 1726 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	318% Outstanding	Read 1,970 Write 2,250 Mixed 1819 SusWrite 1,772 441% 1,953 MB/s	4K Read 48.3 4K Write 158 4K Mixed 71.3 248% 92.5 MB/s	DQ Read 1,302 DQ Write 1,126 DQ Mixed 1,218 912% 1,216 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 318% Great: 347%
PNY CS900 120GB-$25 42,924 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 111GB free Firmware: CS900711 SusWrite @10s intervals: 272 54 54 54 54 51 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	58.6% Above average	Read 388 Write 364 Mixed 306 SusWrite 89.5 64% 287 MB/s	4K Read 25.5 4K Write 69.3 4K Mixed 19.9 101% 38.2 MB/s	DQ Read 161 DQ Write 185 DQ Mixed 120 105% 156 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 58.6% Great: 87%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 396GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 136 135 138 138 138 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	87.2% Excellent	Read 168 Write 134 Mixed 80 SusWrite 136 95% 129 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1.1 221% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 87.2% Great: 109%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$95 26,217 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 3.5TB free Firmware: SC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 189 193 195 196 196 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	110% Outstanding	Read 191 Write 194 Mixed 79.3 SusWrite 191 120% 164 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 108%
WD My Passport 25E2 3TB 3,377 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 2TB free, PID 25e2 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 104 106 103 106 106 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	61.7% Good	Read 116 Write 106 Mixed 69.7 SusWrite 105 132% 98.9 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 7.1 4K Mixed 0.7 269% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 61.7% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 CMW32GX4M2C3200C16 CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 CMW32GX4M2C3200C16 64GB 733 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	95.3% Outstanding	MC Read 38 MC Write 33 MC Mixed 35 101% 35.3 GB/s	SC Read 22.5 SC Write 23 SC Mixed 30.9 73% 25.5 GB/s	Latency 83.5 48% 83.5 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 95.3% Great: 122%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,809 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	4,643x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $202Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	4,263x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $151Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	3,412x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2,235x
RTX 3080Nvidia $625Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	2,073x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,467x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,835x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $104Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	1,106x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	866x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	770x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	724x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	646x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $932

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16