Dell Studio XPS 1645

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemDell Studio XPS 1645  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0VV228
Memory4.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 05 '21 at 14:59
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 Q 740-$190
U2E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.75 GHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
59.4% Above average
Memory 91.6
1-Core 55.5
2-Core 107
55% 84.6 Pts
4-Core 151
8-Core 213
23% 182 Pts
64-Core 216
13% 216 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Mobility Radeon HD 5730
Dell(1028 02FE) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
3% Terrible
Lighting 2.8
Reflection 5.8
Parallax 5
2% 4.53 fps
MRender 5.6
Gravity 4.4
Splatting 5.9
4% 5.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Netac 120GB 120GB
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0929A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 13 14 28 179 58 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.4% Below average
Read 242
Write 220
Mixed 207
SusWrite 51.2
40% 180 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 8.1
4K Mixed 7.3
40% 11 MB/s
DQ Read 93.6
DQ Write 170
DQ Mixed 1.7
38% 88.4 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 95%
Hitachi HTS725050A9A362 500GB
188GB free
Firmware: PC4OC70E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 12 13 19 45 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
21.7% Poor
Read 53.7
Write 50.6
Mixed 35.8
SusWrite 21.7
30% 40.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
132% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M471B5273CH0-CH9 80AD HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
33.7% Below average
MC Read 13
MC Write 9.2
MC Mixed 10.1
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 10
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 64.8
62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Studio XPS 1645 Builds (Compare 68 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Studio XPS 1645

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $248
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback