Asus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive309% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory50.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210713
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateOct 23 '21 at 19:56
Run Duration285 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-11900K-$250
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
Memory 65.7
1-Core 188
2-Core 356
105% 203 Pts
4-Core 673
8-Core 1,154
111% 914 Pts
64-Core 1,791
111% 1,791 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$550
Asus(1043 882E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 472.12
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
113% Outstanding
Lighting 123
Reflection 248
Parallax 283
100% 218 fps
MRender 297
Gravity 232
Splatting 66
148% 198 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 113%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte Aorus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$80
455GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM11.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3331 3401 1193 882 871 823 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
309% Outstanding
Read 2011
Write 3,439
Mixed 2,142
SusWrite 1,750
529% 2,336 MB/s
4K Read 47.5
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 66.2
227% 82.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,300
DQ Write 1,007
DQ Mixed 1,218
894% 1,175 MB/s
Poor: 215%
This bench: 309%
Great: 491%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
92GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,568
Write 1952
Mixed 1,805
468% 2,108 MB/s
4K Read 63.5
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 83.8
274% 93.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,412
DQ Write 1,092
DQ Mixed 1,207
915% 1,237 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 346%
Hitachi HTS541010B7E610 1TB
681GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 108 106 107 112 110 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
67.5% Good
Read 126
Write 69.4
Mixed 84.6
SusWrite 108
72% 97 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.3
166% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 72%
Hitachi HUA5C3020ALA640 2TB
397GB free
Firmware: ME0KR5A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 91 96 96 99 95 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Read 91.9
Write 90.1
Mixed 34.3
SusWrite 95.5
57% 77.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
98% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 64%
Hitachi HTS725050A9A362 500GB
61GB free
Firmware: 7101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 33 41 41 41 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
22.5% Poor
Read 39
Write 38.3
Mixed 33.8
SusWrite 39
28% 37.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 61%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
31GB free
Firmware: AP25
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 108
Write 69
Mixed 67.1
61% 81.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1
168% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3200C16-16GTZRX 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
67.7% Good
MC Read 24.7
MC Write 24.4
MC Mixed 23.3
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 27.4
SC Mixed 22.2
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 151%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 10,986 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 150%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 151%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $827
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $369WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback