Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X399 DESIGNARE EX-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics0.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive92.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemGigabyte X399 DESIGNARE EX
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X399 DESIGNARE EX-CF  (all builds)
Memory117.6 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2048 x 1152 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191211
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJun 09 '21 at 13:18
Run Duration396 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 2990WX-$790
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Memory 60
1-Core 122
2-Core 251
76% 144 Pts
4-Core 473
8-Core 909
82% 691 Pts
64-Core 4,532
280% 4,532 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
EVGA(3842 1312) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.74
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.82% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 0.4
Parallax 0.4
1% 0.57 fps
MRender 1.8
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 1.4
1% 1.2 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.82%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 3 239GB
104GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 92 96 92 90 95 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
92.3% Outstanding
Read 1,052
Write 1,201
Mixed 590
SusWrite 93.2
164% 734 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 61
4K Mixed 27.7
99% 36.5 MB/s
DQ Read 288
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 132
150% 253 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 109%
Amd-raid Array 4 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2559 2595 2603 2559 2586 2573 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
275% Outstanding
Read 1,270
Write 2,622
Mixed 1,317
SusWrite 2,579
444% 1,947 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 88.1
4K Mixed 35.4
133% 50.2 MB/s
DQ Read 512
DQ Write 684
DQ Mixed 570
438% 589 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 275%
Great: 413%
Amd-raid Array 5 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2522 2527 2525 2507 2521 2515 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
268% Outstanding
Read 1,200
Write 2,497
Mixed 1,288
SusWrite 2,520
428% 1,876 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 87.6
4K Mixed 34.8
131% 49.7 MB/s
DQ Read 516
DQ Write 642
DQ Mixed 546
421% 568 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 268%
Great: 268%
Amd-raid Array 6 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2453 2452 2466 2453 2453 2466 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
267% Outstanding
Read 1,284
Write 2,109
Mixed 1,342
SusWrite 2,457
409% 1,798 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 86.4
4K Mixed 33.2
127% 48.5 MB/s
DQ Read 500
DQ Write 721
DQ Mixed 566
441% 596 MB/s
Poor: 267%
This bench: 267%
Great: 694%
Amd-raid Array 1 12TB
11TB free
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 169 178 173 163 174 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
Read 150
Write 161
Mixed 76.2
SusWrite 171
102% 140 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 1.3
322% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 333%
Amd-raid Array 2 12TB
11TB free
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 169 178 174 165 174 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
Read 154
Write 220
Mixed 103
SusWrite 171
119% 162 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 1
336% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 123%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB
7TB free
Firmware: 0915
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 178 178 175 174 181 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 15% Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
MC Read 29.9
MC Write 29.5
MC Mixed 27.5
83% 29 GB/s
SC Read 25.9
SC Write 32.6
SC Mixed 27.6
82% 28.7 GB/s
Latency 128
31% 128 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 176%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X399 DESIGNARE EX-CF Builds (Compare 224 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 123%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 137%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X399 DESIGNARE EX-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,463
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback