HP Z800 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP Z800 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0AECh
Memory22.6 GB free of 48.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180305
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 11 '21 at 11:48
Run Duration375 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5670
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Memory 91.4
1-Core 83.2
2-Core 162
68% 112 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 602
54% 457 Pts
64-Core 1,161
72% 1,161 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
Gigabyte(1458 3623) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.83% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 2.9
Parallax 0.7
2% 1.93 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 2.1
2% 2.37 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.83%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Raid0 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1570 1159 996 684 427 405 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
723% Outstanding
Read 2,268
Write 1,651
Mixed 1,943
SusWrite 873
376% 1,684 MB/s
4K Read 549
4K Write 442
4K Mixed 468
1,666% 486 MB/s
DQ Read 1,553
DQ Write 1,383
DQ Mixed 1,379
1,058% 1,438 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 723%
Great: 723%
Samsung PM841 mSATA 256GB
207GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT43D0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 948 1022 562 560 563 535 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 44% Great: 77%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
100GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 912 1502 977 951 731 625 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
738% Outstanding
Read 2,414
Write 1,675
Mixed 1,965
SusWrite 950
391% 1,751 MB/s
4K Read 549
4K Write 448
4K Mixed 478
1,681% 492 MB/s
DQ Read 1,559
DQ Write 1,279
DQ Mixed 1392
1,050% 1,410 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 738%
Great: 340%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$105
69GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,439
Write 1,674
Mixed 1,968
450% 2,027 MB/s
4K Read 552
4K Write 447
4K Mixed 470
1,676% 490 MB/s
DQ Read 1,438
DQ Write 1,261
DQ Mixed 1,342
1,008% 1,347 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
Inateck ASM1153E 500GB
366GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 640 1116 336 334 323 314 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 16% Great: 266%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7AFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7AFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 82GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 34816 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.6% Above average
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 20.1
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 6.6
20% 7 GB/s
Latency 65.1
61% 65.1 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z800 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,955 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z800 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback