Performance Results


Gaming 66% Battle cruiser	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 56% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	71.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	86.7% Excellent	Memory 84.4 1-Core 123 2-Core 234 82% 147 Pts	4-Core 483 8-Core 663 72% 573 Pts	64-Core 667 41% 667 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 86.7% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299 412,133 User benchmarks, average bench 94% Asus(1043 8623) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.47 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	71.3% Very good	Lighting 113 Reflection 110 Parallax 107 92% 110 fps	MRender 11.4 Gravity 93.4 Splatting 15.3 31% 40 fps
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 71.3% Great: 101%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 5,987 User benchmarks, average bench 191% 2GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,117 Write 349 Mixed 330 130% 599 MB/s	4K Read 41.2 4K Write 112 4K Mixed 44.1 178% 65.9 MB/s	DQ Read 490 DQ Write 196 DQ Mixed 157 165% 281 MB/s
Poor: 122% Great: 239%
T253T2256G0C101 256GB 64 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 139GB free Firmware: SN07542 SusWrite @10s intervals: 419 403 386 432 373 235 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 449 Write 458 Mixed 395 SusWrite 374 94% 419 MB/s	4K Read 41.1 4K Write 98.9 4K Mixed 44.1 171% 61.4 MB/s	DQ Read 205 DQ Write 296 DQ Mixed 250 189% 250 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 104%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905625-004.A03LF 2x8GB 234 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	77.4% Very good	MC Read 29.1 MC Write 30 MC Mixed 25 80% 28 GB/s	SC Read 15.1 SC Write 26.2 SC Mixed 22.3 61% 21.2 GB/s	Latency 72.8 55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 77.4% Great: 93%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	495x
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	486x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	467x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	1,379x
Atermiter 2x8GBUnknownBench 59%, 2,316 samples	494x
123456789012345678 4x2GBABCDBench 24%, 5,869 samples	357x

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87