Today's hottest deals

EVGA 132-CK-NF79

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.36% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardEVGA 132-CK-NF79  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.5 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091230
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 16 '21 at 00:50
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Extreme X9770
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
63.3% Good
Memory 85.9
1-Core 59.8
2-Core 120
56% 88.5 Pts
4-Core 237
8-Core 238
32% 238 Pts
64-Core 239
15% 239 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 280
BFG(19F1 0A1A) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
9.36% Terrible
Lighting 13.2
Reflection 14.8
Parallax 6.6
11% 11.5 fps
MRender 10.9
Gravity 11
Splatting 4.2
7% 8.7 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.36%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST32000641AS 2TB-$142
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 98 100 100 108 107 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 93.8
Write 107
Mixed 58.8
SusWrite 100
66% 90.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DRAM
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.4% Poor
MC Read 8.5
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 6.2
21% 7.43 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 6.4
21% 7.2 GB/s
Latency 71.3
56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 132-CK-NF79 Builds (Compare 44 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: EVGA 132-CK-NF79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $225
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback