Asus H97M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics53.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H97M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180408
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateJun 17 '21 at 16:54
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690-$51
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
69.5% Good
Memory 77.6
1-Core 93.9
2-Core 195
69% 122 Pts
4-Core 356
8-Core 355
48% 355 Pts
64-Core 374
23% 374 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1360 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.5.1
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Lighting 68.4
Reflection 63
Parallax 93.2
56% 74.9 fps
MRender 66.1
Gravity 74.9
Splatting 45.9
49% 62.3 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB
212GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 384 411 428 230 394 298 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 465
Write 350
Mixed 272
SusWrite 358
81% 361 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 92.8
4K Mixed 44.3
158% 57.2 MB/s
DQ Read 366
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 222
198% 299 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 104%
Great: 117%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
466GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 97 98 97 98 98 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 87.8
Write 86.3
Mixed 48
SusWrite 97.2
58% 79.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 0420 F3-12800CL9-4GBRL 0215 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 0420 F3-12800CL9-4GBRL 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.7% Average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 14.1
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 14.6
SC Mixed 13.6
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 85.2
47% 85.2 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 38: 3R 4G 11B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
38% 20% 92 273 207 60 24" 1920 1080 BNQ78CE BenQ GL2460
History:
Typical H97M-PLUS Builds (Compare 976 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H97M-PLUS - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $390
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback