Asrock X399M Taichi

Performance Results


Gaming 79% Battleship	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 91% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	166% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock X399M Taichi (all builds)
Memory	27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191204
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 22 '21 at 16:00
Run Duration	169 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 1920X-$800 10,440 User benchmarks, average bench 78% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	70.8% Very good	Memory 59 1-Core 110 2-Core 225 70% 131 Pts	4-Core 442 8-Core 742 72% 592 Pts	64-Core 1,866 116% 1,866 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 70.8% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% EVGA(3842 2173) CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.63 Performing below potential (60^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	105% Outstanding	Lighting 125 Reflection 120 Parallax 135 102% 127 fps	MRender 186 Gravity 136 Splatting 111 114% 144 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 112%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kbg30zmv256g KIOXIA 256GB 8,196 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 192GB free (System drive) Firmware: ADHA0102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 782 847 850 828 679 201 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	166% Outstanding	Read 922 Write 808 Mixed 860 SusWrite 698 185% 822 MB/s	4K Read 43.1 4K Write 104 4K Mixed 57.8 194% 68.3 MB/s	DQ Read 581 DQ Write 568 DQ Mixed 512 402% 554 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 166% Great: 152%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 466GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 479 477 475 471 475 475 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	116% Outstanding	Read 494 Write 473 Mixed 407 SusWrite 475 104% 462 MB/s	4K Read 37.9 4K Write 77.9 4K Mixed 50.6 164% 55.5 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 353 DQ Mixed 361 272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 134%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS16G4D30AESB.M16FE 2x16GB 3,387 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	88.6% Excellent	MC Read 33.7 MC Write 27.9 MC Mixed 32.8 90% 31.5 GB/s	SC Read 26.1 SC Write 39.5 SC Mixed 31.1 92% 32.2 GB/s	Latency 130 31% 130 ns
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 88.6% Great: 137%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	7	6	60	23.5"	1280 720	IVM6110 PL2473H

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X399M Taichi Builds (Compare 126 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 144%

UFO

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 175%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X399M Taichi

CPU
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples	47x
Ryzen TR 1920XAMD $800Bench 78%, 10,440 samples	27x
Ryzen TR 2950XAMD $1,075Bench 81%, 10,169 samples	16x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $625Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	7x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	7x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	7x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	9x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	6x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	6x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	7x
D4U0836144B 4x8GBUnknownBench 137%, 50 samples	4x
HMA82GU6CJR8N-VK 2x16GBHynixBench 84%, 1,261 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 82% - Excellent

Total price: $1,006

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16