PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 28.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus H61M-A/USB3 (all builds) |
Memory | 4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20140625 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jun 24 '21 at 17:50 |
Run Duration | 187 Seconds |
Run User | MAR-User |
Background CPU | 5% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
67.6%
Good
|
66% 112 Pts
|
43% 322 Pts
|
18% 282 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Zotac(19DA A454) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28.7%
Poor
|
30% 38.3 fps
|
27% 33.4 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$22
341GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 86 72 74 25 76 MB/s
|
44.5%
Average
|
54% 73.4 MB/s
|
115% 0.87 MB/s
|
|
![]() Seagate ST380815AS 80GB-$46
65GB free
Firmware: 4.AAA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 72 72 72 72 72 MB/s
|
40.3%
Average
|
40% 54 MB/s
|
123% 0.97 MB/s
|
|
![]() VendorCo ProductCode 8GB
6GB free, PID 5678
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.2 12 11 12 13 13 MB/s
|
6.44%
Terrible
|
16% 13.6 MB/s
|
10% 0.87 MB/s
|
|
![]() HGST HTS 545050A7E380 500GB
278GB free, PID 0701
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 23 23 22 22 22 MB/s
|
14.4%
Very poor
|
36% 27 MB/s
|
70% 0.83 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G4M1 Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
46%
Average
|
46% 15.9 GB/s
|
38% 13.3 GB/s
|
50% 79.6 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 9 | 7 | 60 | 23" | 1280 720 | HWP294A HP LA2306 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples | 27x |
Core i3-3240IntelBench 55%, 37,789 samples | 22x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 22x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 30x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 17x |
GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples | 11x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 21% - Poor | Total price: $28 |