Asus Z97-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics52.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus Z97-PRO  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151027
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 02 '18 at 17:24
Run Duration337 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
92% Outstanding
Memory 97.1
1-Core 128
2-Core 223
87% 150 Pts
4-Core 472
8-Core 651
71% 562 Pts
64-Core 661
41% 661 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 92%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 411.70
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
52.9% Above average
Lighting 65.7
Reflection 70.4
Parallax 62.6
54% 66.2 fps
MRender 72.5
Gravity 62.6
Splatting 56.9
52% 64 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
282GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 604 464 92 462 285 286 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
PNY CS1311 240GB-$78
92GB free
Firmware: CS131122
SusWrite @10s intervals: 386 187 174 174 168 175 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 454
Mixed 381
SusWrite 211
87% 389 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 40
155% 57.9 MB/s
DQ Read 324
DQ Write 299
DQ Mixed 206
183% 276 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 97%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
716GB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 98 100 104 95 104 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
60.5% Good
Read 112
Write 100
Mixed 56
SusWrite 99.2
67% 91.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 68%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$69
397GB free
Firmware: ST6OA3AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 85 87 87 80 85 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
47% Average
Read 79.5
Write 69.7
Mixed 38
SusWrite 84.2
50% 67.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 47%
Great: 61%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 142 154 154 136 145 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Read 140
Write 132
Mixed 26
SusWrite 146
80% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 0.7
199% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$80
225GB free
Firmware: CC3C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 72 70 79 73 76 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
43.1% Average
Read 73.8
Write 66.2
Mixed 26
SusWrite 74.8
44% 60.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 6
4K Mixed 0.4
180% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 75%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$80
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 98 101 99 94 103 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Read 92.5
Write 96
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 98.4
56% 78 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 5.8
4K Mixed 0.4
181% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 75%
HGST HTS 545050A7E380 500GB
64GB free, PID 0701
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 99 101 100 98 102 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
39.9% Below average
Read 92.7
Write 86.2
Mixed 37.2
SusWrite 99.7
105% 78.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2400 C11 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
MC Read 31.7
MC Write 32
MC Mixed 27.3
87% 30.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 23.3
SC Mixed 25.6
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 49.9
80% 49.9 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97-PRO Builds (Compare 634 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-PRO - $215

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $848
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $376WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback