Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics91.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive54.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory39.8 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190715
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 26 '21 at 00:35
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700F-$279
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
96.7% Outstanding
Memory 87.2
1-Core 141
2-Core 286
94% 172 Pts
4-Core 568
8-Core 1,102
99% 835 Pts
64-Core 1,118
69% 1,118 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 96.7%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$271
Asus(1043 86F0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.77
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
91.1% Outstanding
Lighting 114
Reflection 108
Parallax 110
93% 111 fps
MRender 136
Gravity 101
Splatting 92.5
88% 110 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
608GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 52 9.3 131 247 19 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
54.3% Above average
Read 497
Write 392
Mixed 386
SusWrite 122
78% 349 MB/s
4K Read 14.4
4K Write 27.1
4K Mixed 14.5
55% 18.7 MB/s
DQ Read 143
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 37
84% 167 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
560GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 151 154 153 152 153 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Read 162
Write 143
Mixed 101
SusWrite 151
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
203% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 109%
WDC WD60 EZAZ-00SF3B0 6TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 41 41 41 42 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
46% Average
Read 40
Write 39.7
Mixed 35.3
SusWrite 40.3
53% 38.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 9.9
4K Mixed 0.9
383% 5.03 MB/s
DQ Read 0.5
DQ Write 10.4
DQ Mixed 0.9
386% 3.93 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4DFD8266.C16FP Adata CT16G4DFD8266.C16FP Adata 48GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
16384, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
89.8% Excellent
MC Read 33
MC Write 35.2
MC Mixed 28.2
92% 32.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.2
SC Write 37.7
SC Mixed 26
79% 27.6 GB/s
Latency 70.3
57% 70.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 17 107 5 60 27" 1920 1080 VSC7936 VG2748
Typical TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,368 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $422
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback