Asrock Z590 Phantom Gaming-ITX/TB4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 111%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics97.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive298% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsrock Z590 Phantom Gaming-ITX/TB4  (all builds)
Memory26.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210727
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 17 '23 at 21:15
Run Duration459 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11700-$224
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 94.6
1-Core 163
2-Core 335
106% 198 Pts
4-Core 658
8-Core 1233
113% 945 Pts
64-Core 1,582
98% 1,582 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 109%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
HP(103C 88D4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.01
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (120 fps cap detected)
97.7% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 120
Parallax 120
98% 120 fps
MRender 120
Gravity 120
Splatting 118
98% 119 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 97.7%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-256G-1001 256GB
187GB free
Firmware: 11170101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 665 499 493 490 491 507 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
242% Outstanding
Read 1,754
Write 1,976
Mixed 1,521
SusWrite 524
324% 1,444 MB/s
4K Read 54.1
4K Write 218
4K Mixed 81.2
301% 118 MB/s
DQ Read 1,067
DQ Write 1,072
DQ Mixed 899
723% 1,013 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 242%
Great: 228%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$45
221GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 449 479 402 300 300 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 483
Mixed 467
SusWrite 372
103% 458 MB/s
4K Read 49
4K Write 87.6
4K Mixed 59.2
196% 65.3 MB/s
DQ Read 366
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 341
256% 343 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 120%
Great: 128%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$55
282GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1066 826 834 817 824 817 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
298% Outstanding
Read 2,574
Write 2340
Mixed 1,760
SusWrite 864
421% 1,884 MB/s
4K Read 69.9
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 81.8
268% 86.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,575
DQ Write 1,078
DQ Mixed 1,303
979% 1,318 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 298%
Great: 346%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
260GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 475 483 485 485 424 348 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 484
Mixed 444
SusWrite 450
106% 472 MB/s
4K Read 48.3
4K Write 87.3
4K Mixed 59.3
195% 65 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 339
256% 343 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 124%
Great: 129%
WDC WD12 0EFBX-68B0EN0 12TB
4.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 152 153 152 152 149 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Read 196
Write 200
Mixed 122
SusWrite 151
223% 168 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 6.3
4K Mixed 1.3
267% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 81%
WDC WD60 EZAZ-00SF3B0 6TB
853GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 170 170 169 168 169 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 153
Mixed 87.8
SusWrite 169
195% 148 MB/s
4K Read 7.6
4K Write 11.4
4K Mixed 1.1
453% 6.7 MB/s
DQ Read 0.6
DQ Write 11.7
DQ Mixed 0.9
431% 4.4 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 100%
Great: 100%
WDC WD60 EZAZ-00SF3B0 6TB
3.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 151 152 152 152 149 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
96% Outstanding
Read 188
Write 158
Mixed 93.1
SusWrite 151
193% 148 MB/s
4K Read 9.9
4K Write 10.9
4K Mixed 0.9
438% 7.23 MB/s
DQ Read 0.5
DQ Write 11.1
DQ Mixed 0.9
410% 4.17 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 96%
Great: 100%
WDC WD12 0EFBX-68B0EN0 12TB
3.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 81 79 80 81 80 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Read 145
Write 163
Mixed 96
SusWrite 79.1
160% 121 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 1.4
264% 3.3 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 76%
WDC WD60 EZRZ-00GZ5B1 6TB
3.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 162 158 161 163 161 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
66% Good
Read 160
Write 168
Mixed 126
SusWrite 159
209% 153 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
126% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 66%
Great: 66%
WDC WD60 EZAZ-00ZGHB0 6TB
1TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 80 79 80 81 80 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 143
Write 134
Mixed 109
SusWrite 79.2
153% 116 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 8.1
4K Mixed 0.7
309% 3.8 MB/s
DQ Read 0.4
DQ Write 7.7
DQ Mixed 0.6
284% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 86%
WDC WD12 0EFBX-68B0EN0 12TB
3.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 134 134 135 135 136 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
66.9% Good
Read 131
Write 142
Mixed 96.7
SusWrite 132
171% 126 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 6
4K Mixed 1.3
257% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 76%
WDC WD12 0EFBX-68B0EN0 12TB
5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 134 134 135 135 135 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Read 178
Write 188
Mixed 121
SusWrite 132
207% 155 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 6.2
4K Mixed 1.3
263% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 76%
WDC WD12 0EFBX-68B0EN0 12TB
4.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 134 134 135 135 135 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
75% Very good
Read 186
Write 191
Mixed 119
SusWrite 132
208% 157 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 1.4
264% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 75%
Great: 76%
WDC WD12 0EFBX-68B0EN0 12TB
4TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 145 140 141 145 147 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
69.3% Good
Read 132
Write 150
Mixed 104
SusWrite 142
181% 132 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 1.3
260% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 76%
WDC WD12 0EFBX-68B0EN0 12TB
5.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 145 140 141 144 148 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Read 179
Write 187
Mixed 130
SusWrite 142
214% 160 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 6.2
4K Mixed 1.3
261% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF2G64AZ-3G2E1 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 42.1
MC Write 40.4
MC Mixed 32.5
110% 38.3 GB/s
SC Read 25.9
SC Write 43
SC Mixed 30.9
95% 33.3 GB/s
Latency 57.6
69% 57.6 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 107%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 60 55" 1920 1009 SNY045B SONY TV *00
Typical Z590 Phantom Gaming-ITX/TB4 Builds (Compare 148 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z590 Phantom Gaming-ITX/TB4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 119% - Outstanding Total price: $641
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback