HP Victus by HP 15L Gaming Desktop TG02-0xxx

Performance Results


Gaming 153% UFO	Desktop 116% UFO	Workstation 164% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 116%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	357% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

System	HP Victus by HP 15L Gaming Desktop TG02-0xxx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 89B5
Memory	25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20230706
Uptime	5.9 Days
Run Date	Sep 09 '23 at 14:21
Run Duration	357 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-12700 25,535 User benchmarks, average bench 108% U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	116% Outstanding	Memory 88.1 1-Core 198 2-Core 394 119% 227 Pts	4-Core 765 8-Core 1,437 131% 1,101 Pts	64-Core 2125 132% 2125 Pts
Poor: 100% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 115%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340 442,467 User benchmarks, average bench 128% HP(103C 88D4) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.99 Performing below potential (78^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	131% Outstanding	Lighting 184 Reflection 176 Parallax 167 150% 176 fps	MRender 190 Gravity 138 Splatting 116 117% 148 fps
Poor: 116% ↑ This bench: 131% Great: 136%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme SK hynix BC711 HFM001TD3JX013N 1TB 177 User benchmarks, average bench 271% 381GB free (System drive) Firmware: HPS1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1376 1188 1225 1238 1240 1091 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	357% Outstanding	Read 2,350 Write 2,470 Mixed 1,790 SusWrite 1,226 440% 1,959 MB/s	4K Read 70.1 4K Write 215 4K Mixed 104 353% 129 MB/s	DQ Read 1,902 DQ Write 1,624 DQ Mixed 1,736 1,308% 1754 MB/s
Poor: 177% ↑ This bench: 357% Great: 362%
WDC WDS250G2B0A-00SM50 250GB 12,305 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 27GB free Firmware: 401020WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 268 231 221 225 230 222 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 487 Write 455 Mixed 231 SusWrite 233 78% 352 MB/s	4K Read 35.6 4K Write 110 4K Mixed 51.5 178% 65.8 MB/s	DQ Read 375 DQ Write 302 DQ Mixed 256 214% 311 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 105%
WDC WD12 0EFBX-68B0EN0 12TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 4.5TB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	48.3% Average	Read 196 Write 97.7 Mixed 124 SusWrite 1.5 122% 105 MB/s	4K Read 2.6 4K Write 6.2 4K Mixed 1.5 272% 3.43 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 48.3% Great: 76%
WDC WD60 EZAZ-00SF3B0 6TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 950GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 155 156 157 155 155 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	86.8% Excellent	Read 151 Write 63.7 Mixed 61.9 SusWrite 156 138% 108 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 9.9 4K Mixed 0.9 374% 4.23 MB/s	DQ Read 0.5 DQ Write 12.6 DQ Mixed 1.1 468% 4.73 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 86.8% Great: 105%
WDC WD60 EZAZ-00SF3B0 6TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 3.5TB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 155 156 157 155 155 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	89.9% Excellent	Read 165 Write 70.7 Mixed 64.2 SusWrite 156 144% 114 MB/s	4K Read 2.3 4K Write 10.2 4K Mixed 0.9 386% 4.47 MB/s	DQ Read 0.5 DQ Write 12.3 DQ Mixed 0.9 451% 4.57 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 89.9% Great: 105%
WDC WD12 0EFBX-68B0EN0 12TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 4TB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 132 132 131 131 129 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	70.3% Very good	Read 155 Write 82.8 Mixed 120 SusWrite 129 159% 122 MB/s	4K Read 2.5 4K Write 6.2 4K Mixed 1.4 268% 3.37 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 76%
WDC WD60 EZRZ-00GZ5B1 6TB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 3.5TB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 132 132 131 131 129 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	59.9% Above average	Read 159 Write 105 Mixed 124 SusWrite 129 170% 129 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.1 133% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 59.9% Great: 66%
WDC WD60 EZAZ-00ZGHB0 6TB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 1TB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 132 132 131 131 129 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	78.8% Very good	Read 142 Write 130 Mixed 93.4 SusWrite 129 165% 124 MB/s	4K Read 17.9 4K Write 8.4 4K Mixed 0.7 376% 9 MB/s	DQ Read 0.4 DQ Write 8.5 DQ Mixed 0.6 311% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 78.8% Great: 86%
WDC WD12 0EFBX-68B0EN0 12TB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 3.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 135 135 134 136 133 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	67.6% Good	Read 134 Write 137 Mixed 99.3 SusWrite 135 171% 126 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 6 4K Mixed 1.5 262% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 67.6% Great: 81%
WDC WD12 0EFBX-68B0EN0 12TB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 135 135 134 136 133 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	67.3% Good	Read 131 Write 77.2 Mixed 110 SusWrite 135 151% 113 MB/s	4K Read 2.4 4K Write 6 4K Mixed 1.6 267% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 67.3% Great: 81%
WDC WD12 0EFBX-68B0EN0 12TB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 135 135 134 136 133 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	75.2% Very good	Read 184 Write 92.7 Mixed 123 SusWrite 135 171% 133 MB/s	4K Read 2.2 4K Write 6.1 4K Mixed 1.4 263% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 75.2% Great: 81%
WDC WD12 0EFBX-68B0EN0 12TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 4TB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 147 145 142 144 138 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	75.2% Very good	Read 168 Write 173 Mixed 124 SusWrite 144 205% 152 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 6.2 4K Mixed 1.5 269% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 75.2% Great: 76%
WDC WD12 0EFBX-68B0EN0 12TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 5.5TB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 147 145 141 144 138 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	74.6% Very good	Read 166 Write 80.3 Mixed 116 SusWrite 144 164% 127 MB/s	4K Read 2.1 4K Write 6.1 4K Mixed 1.4 263% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 74.6% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A2G43AB3-CWE M378A2G43BB3-CWE 32GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 3200, 3200 MHz 16384, 16384 MB Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	106% Outstanding	MC Read 41.4 MC Write 38.4 MC Mixed 35.4 110% 38.4 GB/s	SC Read 24.5 SC Write 41.3 SC Mixed 29.3 91% 31.7 GB/s	Latency 69.5 58% 69.5 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 109%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	59	60	27.2"	1280 720	GSM7707 LG HDR 4K

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Victus by HP 15L Gaming Desktop TG02-0xxx Builds (Compare 2,204 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 128%

UFO

Desktop 103%

UFO

Workstation 120%

UFO

System: HP Victus by HP 15L Gaming Desktop TG02-0xxx

CPU
Core i5-12400FIntel $110Bench 98%, 48,886 samples	597x
Ryzen 5 5600GAMD $119Bench 86%, 14,368 samples	380x
Core i7-12700FIntel $250Bench 109%, 19,845 samples	369x

GPU
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	655x
RTX 3060Nvidia $226Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	592x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	212x

SSD
SK hynix BC711 HFM512GD3JX013N 512GBNvmeBench 216%, 1,528 samples	592x
INTEL SSDPEKNU010TZH 1TBNvmeBench 293%, 346 samples	264x
hynix BC711 HFM512GD3JX013N 512GBSKBench 198%, 4,708 samples	204x

RAM
M378A1K43EB2-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 96%, 6,792 samples	304x
HMAA1GU6CJR6N-XN 2x8GBHynixBench 77%, 1,078 samples	270x
8ATF1G64AZ-3G2R1 2x8GBMicronBench 92%, 1,436 samples	191x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 99% - Outstanding

Total price: $450

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363