HP h8-1090t

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	52.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP h8-1090t (all builds)
Motherboard	PEGATRON 2A86
Memory	10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110915
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Apr 07 '22 at 16:52
Run Duration	369 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 X 990-$499 4,994 User benchmarks, average bench 78% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.45 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	78.5% Very good	Memory 94.3 1-Core 88.2 2-Core 177 71% 120 Pts	4-Core 339 8-Core 553 55% 446 Pts	64-Core 615 38% 615 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 78.5% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Asus(1043 85ED) 3GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 512.15 Performing below potential (62^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	52.5% Above average	Lighting 64 Reflection 66.8 Parallax 61.7 52% 64.2 fps	MRender 66.5 Gravity 66.5 Splatting 62.3 53% 65.1 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 52.5% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 137GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,934 Write 2,710 Mixed 2,686 620% 2,777 MB/s	4K Read 174 4K Write 78.6 4K Mixed 78.9 407% 111 MB/s	DQ Read 424 DQ Write 185 DQ Mixed 165 159% 258 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
WD Green 2TB (2009)-$113 12,948 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 413GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 69 69 69 68 69 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	38.1% Below average	Read 63.8 Write 60.2 Mixed 37.5 SusWrite 68.3 42% 57.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.8 161% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 38.1% Great: 60%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB 26,179 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 742GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 86 86 87 87 84 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	50% Average	Read 87.7 Write 78.7 Mixed 52.7 SusWrite 86.2 56% 76.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 156% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 50% Great: 51%
WD Blue 6TB (2015)-$215 8,416 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 639GB free Firmware: 080. SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 30 30 30 30 30 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	34% Below average	Read 88.6 Write 99.9 Mixed 62.9 SusWrite 29.3 52% 70.2 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 188% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 34% Great: 97%
WD Green 6TB (2014)-$215 4,204 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 1.5TB free Firmware: 080. SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 30 30 30 30 30 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	40.5% Average	Read 111 Write 100 Mixed 61.1 SusWrite 29.3 56% 75.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1 209% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 40.5% Great: 98%
WD Green 6TB (2014)-$215 4,204 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 788GB free Firmware: 080. SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 30 30 30 30 30 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	34.4% Below average	Read 90.7 Write 82.2 Mixed 30.1 SusWrite 29.3 42% 58.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.5 92% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 34.4% Great: 98%
WD Blue 6TB (2015)-$215 8,416 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 1.5TB free Firmware: 080. SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 30 30 30 30 30 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	40.8% Average	Read 113 Write 67.2 Mixed 37.8 SusWrite 29.3 45% 61.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.6 113% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 40.8% Great: 97%
WDC WD60 EZAZ-00SF3B0 6TB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 3TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0.1 0 37 147 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	61.4% Good	Read 150 Write 138 Mixed 78.5 SusWrite 30.7 124% 99.4 MB/s	4K Read 5.6 4K Write 10.3 4K Mixed 1.1 408% 5.67 MB/s	DQ Read 0.6 DQ Write 9.5 DQ Mixed 1.4 373% 3.83 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 61.4% Great: 100%
WDC WD60 EZAZ-00SF3B0 6TB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 4TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 56 63 66 65 65 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	73.8% Very good	Read 180 Write 152 Mixed 100 SusWrite 64.2 157% 124 MB/s	4K Read 16.3 4K Write 9.7 4K Mixed 0.9 421% 8.97 MB/s	DQ Read 0.6 DQ Write 11.9 DQ Mixed 1 441% 4.5 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 73.8% Great: 100%
WDC WD60 EZRX-00MVLB1 6TB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1.5TB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 67 59 57 58 59 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	38.7% Below average	Read 116 Write 116 Mixed 67.8 SusWrite 60 117% 89.8 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1 133% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 38.7% Great: 47%
WDC WD60 EZRZ-00GZ5B1 6TB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1.5TB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 22 20 19 19 20 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	36.4% Below average	Read 162 Write 155 Mixed 115 SusWrite 20 144% 113 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.1 133% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 36.4% Great: 66%
WDC WD60 EZAZ-00SF3B0 6TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2TB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 22 20 19 19 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	50.9% Above average	Read 107 Write 88.9 Mixed 66.1 SusWrite 20 88% 70.5 MB/s	4K Read 2.5 4K Write 9.9 4K Mixed 1.1 383% 4.5 MB/s	DQ Read 0.6 DQ Write 10.2 DQ Mixed 1.2 390% 4 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 50.9% Great: 105%
WDC WD60 EZAZ-00ZGHB0 6TB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 56 63 66 65 66 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	70.4% Very good	Read 191 Write 163 Mixed 97.8 SusWrite 64.3 162% 129 MB/s	4K Read 16 4K Write 8.1 4K Mixed 0.7 359% 8.27 MB/s	DQ Read 0.4 DQ Write 9.2 DQ Mixed 0.7 338% 3.43 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 70.4% Great: 65%
WDC WD60 EZRZ-00GZ5B1 6TB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 2TB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 22 20 19 19 20 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	36.4% Below average	Read 162 Write 153 Mixed 117 SusWrite 20.1 144% 113 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.1 133% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 36.4% Great: 66%
WDC WD60 EZAZ-00SF3B0 6TB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 1.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0.1 0 0 0 0.5 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	59.5% Above average	Read 178 Write 158 Mixed 89.9 SusWrite 0.1 129% 106 MB/s	4K Read 7.3 4K Write 10.4 4K Mixed 1 415% 6.23 MB/s	DQ Read 0.7 DQ Write 11.2 DQ Mixed 1.1 421% 4.33 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 59.5% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x4GB 106,178 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 6 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	34.5% Below average	MC Read 12.4 MC Write 11.2 MC Mixed 9.1 31% 10.9 GB/s	SC Read 10.8 SC Write 8.9 SC Mixed 11.2 29% 10.3 GB/s	Latency 59.1 68% 59.1 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 34.5% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical h8-1090t Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

System: HP h8-1090t

CPU
Core i7 970Intel $1,141Bench 73%, 4,313 samples	7x
Core i7 X 990Intel $499Bench 78%, 4,994 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 570Nvidia $350Bench 20%, 22,303 samples	1x
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples	1x
GeForce GT 440NvidiaBench 4%, 14,286 samples	1x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	1x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	1x

RAM
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	4x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	2x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 41% - Average

Total price: $1,519

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350