Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 81% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 76% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	81.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	63.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	4.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190715
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Jun 13 '21 at 18:22
Run Duration	202 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	12%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700F-$279 54,980 User benchmarks, average bench 92% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	96.7% Outstanding	Memory 89.2 1-Core 135 2-Core 248 88% 158 Pts	4-Core 559 8-Core 982 93% 771 Pts	64-Core 1,059 66% 1,059 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 96.7% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$269 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Asus(1043 86F0) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.77 Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	81.8% Excellent	Lighting 101 Reflection 96.6 Parallax 95.8 82% 97.8 fps	MRender 124 Gravity 94.1 Splatting 85.4 81% 101 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 81.8% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB 46,239 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 595GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR030 SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 383 415 425 414 419 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	63.6% Good	Read 317 Write 261 Mixed 321 SusWrite 383 72% 320 MB/s	4K Read 14.1 4K Write 35 4K Mixed 14.2 58% 21.1 MB/s	DQ Read 137 DQ Write 312 DQ Mixed 36 81% 162 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 63.6% Great: 100%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 338GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 115 115 114 115 114 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	80.3% Excellent	Read 165 Write 157 Mixed 90.2 SusWrite 114 97% 132 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1.2 244% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 80.3% Great: 109%
MB4000GC WDC 4TB 690GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0 0 0 0 0.4 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	7.99% Terrible	Read 38 Write 6.9 Mixed 11.9 SusWrite 0.1 14% 14.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.7 52% 0.9 MB/s

TOSHIBA HDWE140 4TB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 172GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 36 36 35 35 36 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	19.3% Very poor	Read 38.6 Write 40.1 Mixed 34.2 SusWrite 34.7 50% 36.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 104% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 19.3% Great: 70%
TOSHIBA HDWE140 4TB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 381GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.5 0.1 0 0 0.1 2 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	12.9% Very poor	Read 41 Write 41 Mixed 35.2 SusWrite 0.6 38% 29.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1.1 114% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 12.9% Great: 70%
WDC WD60 EZAZ-00ZGHB0 6TB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 230GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.5 5.9 5.7 6.7 6.5 5.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	30.8% Below average	Read 40.1 Write 40.5 Mixed 33.8 SusWrite 6.5 39% 30.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 7.6 4K Mixed 0.6 282% 3 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 30.8% Great: 86%
WDC WD60 EZAZ-00SF3B0 6TB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 144 144 144 143 144 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	94.6% Outstanding	Read 173 Write 155 Mixed 103 SusWrite 144 190% 144 MB/s	4K Read 8.1 4K Write 11.8 4K Mixed 1.2 472% 7.03 MB/s	DQ Read 0.7 DQ Write 10.4 DQ Mixed 1 390% 4.03 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 94.6% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata 2x8GB 24,552 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	74.2% Very good	MC Read 29.6 MC Write 28.8 MC Mixed 22.5 77% 27 GB/s	SC Read 13.5 SC Write 23.3 SC Mixed 20.5 55% 19.1 GB/s	Latency 68.2 59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 74.2% Great: 98%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,387 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 73%

Battleship

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Core i7-9700FIntel $279Bench 92%, 54,980 samples	1,669x
Core i5-9400FIntel $85Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	1,253x
Core i7-9700KIntel $259Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	183x

GPU
GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples	865x
GTX 1660Nvidia $209Bench 68%, 230,793 samples	494x
RTX 2060S (Super)Nvidia $270Bench 100%, 319,148 samples	439x

SSD
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	309x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $41Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	222x
AS340 240GBApacerBench 71%, 10,970 samples	147x

RAM
2x8GBAdataBench 77%, 24,552 samples	370x
D12.2356WS.001 2x8GBApacerBench 81%, 464 samples	175x
D12.2324CS.001 2x8GBApacerBench 80%, 469 samples	167x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 103% - Outstanding

Total price: $422

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363