Today's hottest deals

To Intel X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics24.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardTo Intel X79  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200330
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 30 '21 at 17:15
Run Duration256 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
72% Very good
Memory 82.6
1-Core 82.9
2-Core 166
65% 110 Pts
4-Core 331
8-Core 640
58% 485 Pts
64-Core 834
52% 834 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 72%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
PNY(196E 0984) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
24.6% Poor
Lighting 28
Reflection 29.9
Parallax 37
23% 31.6 fps
MRender 39.2
Gravity 36
Splatting 29.7
28% 35 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24.6%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme NVME SSD 128GB
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 7A0L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.3 43 41 60 6.1 70 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Read 1,180
Write 9.2
Mixed 17
SusWrite 38.1
65% 311 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 8.5
4K Mixed 14.3
64% 16.7 MB/s
DQ Read 291
DQ Write 232
DQ Mixed 26.2
84% 183 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 163%
Toshiba MQ02ABF050H 500GB
114GB free
Firmware: 1D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 69 70 67 70 69 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 15% Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B5170GB0- 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
61% Good
MC Read 26.6
MC Write 20.4
MC Mixed 21.2
65% 22.7 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 10.9
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 75.9
53% 75.9 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 61%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 66: 8R 5G 11B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
66% 52% 46 335 269 60 21.5" 1536 864 ACR032D Acer V226HQL
History: Score 29: 2R 4G 7B | Score 39: 3R 5G 9B | Score 66: 8R 5G 11B
Typical Intel X79 Builds (Compare 2,026 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: To Intel X79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $155
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $376WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $250Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback