Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 84% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 78% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	44.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210616
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 01 '21 at 06:22
Run Duration	218 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	21%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$151 383,420 User benchmarks, average bench 96% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	80% Excellent	Memory 72.5 1-Core 151 2-Core 291 91% 171 Pts	4-Core 470 8-Core 776 76% 623 Pts	64-Core 890 55% 890 Pts
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 80% Great: 107%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% HP(103C 82FA) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.11 Performing below potential (61^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	103% Outstanding	Lighting 131 Reflection 97.6 Parallax 131 106% 120 fps	MRender 117 Gravity 135 Splatting 117 100% 123 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial M4 256GB-$218 17,938 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 139GB free (System drive) Firmware: 040H SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 184 189 156 132 176 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	44.1% Average	Read 370 Write 198 Mixed 212 SusWrite 175 53% 239 MB/s	4K Read 10.8 4K Write 41.1 4K Mixed 7.8 48% 19.9 MB/s	DQ Read 106 DQ Write 101 DQ Mixed 20.6 38% 76.1 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 44.1% Great: 74%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 853GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 470 468 483 490 492 492 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	114% Outstanding	Read 437 Write 461 Mixed 321 SusWrite 482 96% 425 MB/s	4K Read 34.1 4K Write 104 4K Mixed 46.3 166% 61.6 MB/s	DQ Read 354 DQ Write 349 DQ Mixed 269 225% 324 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 133%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 791GB free Firmware: CC49 SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 69 83 87 77 79 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	34.2% Below average	Read 41.5 Write 99.2 Mixed 43.7 SusWrite 77.3 48% 65.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.5 108% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 34.2% Great: 68%
WD WD5000KS-00MNB0 500GB 1,097 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 359GB free Firmware: 07.02E07 SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 58 59 60 58 61 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	37.4% Below average	Read 70.5 Write 56.4 Mixed 41.4 SusWrite 59.3 42% 56.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 40%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 165GB free Firmware: CC49 SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 83 82 84 81 84 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	44.4% Average	Read 72.2 Write 81.2 Mixed 50.9 SusWrite 82.5 53% 71.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 44.4% Great: 68%
Seagate USB 3.0 Cable 500GB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 206GB free, PID 6338 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 15 15 16 16 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	6.28% Terrible	Read 14.5 Write 14.2 Mixed 12.4 SusWrite 14.7 19% 13.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.2 18% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 6.28% Great: 31%
Lexar Echo 16GB 102 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 13GB free, PID a01a Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 15 16 16 15 16 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	8.85% Terrible	Read 28.9 Write 17 Mixed 10.2 SusWrite 15.1 22% 17.8 MB/s	4K Read 5.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 22% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 8.85% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB 44,547 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	65.3% Good	MC Read 28.4 MC Write 16 MC Mixed 25.6 67% 23.3 GB/s	SC Read 21 SC Write 15.8 SC Mixed 23.7 58% 20.2 GB/s	Latency 95.7 42% 95.7 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 65.3% Great: 116%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	7	5	60	7.2"	1280 720	SAM036D SyncMaster

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING B550-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 2,324 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 142%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS (WI-FI)

CPU
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $151Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	783x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $202Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	552x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	162x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	244x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	223x
RTX 3060Nvidia $279Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	220x

SSD
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	121x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	118x
Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBWD $74Bench 228%, 180,890 samples	80x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	94x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	64x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	47x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 99% - Outstanding

Total price: $690

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16