Huananzhi X99-F8

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Huananzhi X99-F8 (all builds)
Motherboard	HUANANZHI X99-F8
Memory	10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit cores,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200826
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 02 '21 at 01:26
Run Duration	238 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3 1,203 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	72.2% Very good	Memory 82.4 1-Core 78.3 2-Core 140 61% 100 Pts	4-Core 334 8-Core 635 58% 485 Pts	64-Core 1,121 69% 1,121 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 72.2% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 120GB 22,748 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 4GB free (System drive) Firmware: 91.3 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 381 Write 302 Mixed 296 72% 326 MB/s	4K Read 30.8 4K Write 63.9 4K Mixed 29.6 118% 41.4 MB/s	DQ Read 319 DQ Write 325 DQ Mixed 190 179% 278 MB/s
Poor: 37% Great: 94%
Hitachi HDS5C1050CLA382 500GB 2,940 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 250GB free Firmware: A3MA SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 53 54 53 53 47 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	31.5% Below average	Read 58 Write 54.7 Mixed 31.7 SusWrite 51.6 36% 49 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 119% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 31.5% Great: 63%
Hitachi HDS721616PLA320 160GB 669 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 20GB free Firmware: ABGA SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 33 34 28 11 8.5 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	22.3% Poor	Read 52.5 Write 35.3 Mixed 32.7 SusWrite 24.7 27% 36.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 22.3% Great: 39%
WD Purple 2TB (2014)-$67 19,126 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 89GB free Firmware: 0A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 57 56 69 68 69 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	49.3% Average	Read 109 Write 99.2 Mixed 63.3 SusWrite 62.9 62% 83.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.7 129% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 49.3% Great: 86%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TYP4U3000E16082C 2x8GB 354 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	48.5% Average	MC Read 19 MC Write 17 MC Mixed 14.7 48% 16.9 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 14.5 SC Mixed 15 39% 13.7 GB/s	Latency 76.2 52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 48.5% Great: 112%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 10: 0R 0G 10B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
10%	13%	79	304	220	60	0"	1920 1080

History: Score 4: 0R 0G 4B | Score 9: 0R 0G 9B | Score 10: 0R 0G 10B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-F8 Builds (Compare 476 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 76%

Battleship

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 80%

Battleship

System: Huananzhi X99-F8

CPU
Xeon E5-2678 v3IntelBench 71%, 6,301 samples	137x
Xeon E5-2680 v4IntelBench 72%, 1,639 samples	59x
Xeon E5-2680 v3IntelBench 71%, 1,417 samples	32x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $250Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	41x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $239Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	29x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	23x

SSD
NE-512 512GBBench 177%, 5,933 samples	26x
512GB 512GBNvmeBench 181%, 2,208 samples	11x
GAMMIX S11 Pro 512GBXPGBench 246%, 21,659 samples	10x

RAM
HNMI8GD4240D0 4x8GBUnknownBench 91%, 126 samples	23x
Atermiter 2x8GBUnknownBench 59%, 2,316 samples	23x
Atermiter 2x16GBUnknownBench 65%, 839 samples	22x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 95% - Outstanding

Total price: $250

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Huananzhi X99-F8

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

SkillBench Score 10: 0R 0G 10B (High Scores)

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: Huananzhi X99-F8

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)