Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire V3-471

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Aspire V3-471  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer VA40_HC
Memory2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120502
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 03 '21 at 09:55
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User NPL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2370M-$272
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
46.5% Average
Memory 80.3
1-Core 42.2
2-Core 71
44% 64.5 Pts
4-Core 77
8-Core 83.9
11% 80.4 Pts
64-Core 79.6
5% 79.6 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Acer(1025 069D) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
0.57% Terrible
Lighting 0.6
Reflection 1
Parallax 0.4
0% 0.67 fps
MRender 1.5
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 0.6
1% 0.93 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.57%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
UL 256GB 256GB
219GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0205A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 394 354 384 384 374 379 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
68.3% Good
Read 443
Write 403
Mixed 386
SusWrite 378
91% 403 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 32.5
4K Mixed 16.3
66% 22.3 MB/s
DQ Read 159
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 46.5
70% 130 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
26.3% Poor
MC Read 9
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 7.9
24% 8.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 8.1
22% 7.6 GB/s
Latency 80.1
50% 80.1 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 7 4 60 14" 1280 720 LGD02F8
Typical Aspire V3-471 Builds (Compare 49 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire V3-471

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $77
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback