Dell Latitude E6540

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Latitude E6540  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 05V0V4
Memory2.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140626
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 04 '21 at 14:26
Run Duration258 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4310M
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
66.6% Good
Memory 89.2
1-Core 97.2
2-Core 175
72% 120 Pts
4-Core 257
8-Core 253
34% 255 Pts
64-Core 257
16% 257 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Dell(1028 05BE) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
3.39% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 7.1
3% 4.57 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 2.6
Splatting 5.3
4% 4.6 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.39%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix SH920 2.5 128GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1010BL00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 130 124 91 76 79 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 415
Write 207
Mixed 201
SusWrite 114
52% 234 MB/s
4K Read 17.8
4K Write 47.1
4K Mixed 23.2
82% 29.4 MB/s
DQ Read 347
DQ Write 152
DQ Mixed 150
138% 216 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 87%
Freecom Hard Drive XS 1TB
831GB free, PID fc8e
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 16 15 15 15 15 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Read 32.5
Write 21.5
Mixed 30.3
SusWrite 15.4
32% 24.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 20%
PI-239 USB 2.0 Drive 500GB
214GB free, PID 1840
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 15 15 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
8.68% Terrible
Read 7.8
Write 35
Mixed 11.3
SusWrite 16
26% 17.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
62% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.68%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
52.4% Above average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 15.6
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 17.3
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 68.2
59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 48: 4R 5G 13B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
48% 16% 135 69 51 60 15.5" 1366 768 SDC5441
History: Score 45: 6R 4G 3B | Score 52: 8R 4G 0B | Score 48: 4R 5G 13B
Typical Latitude E6540 Builds (Compare 2,311 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude E6540

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $178
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback