Today's hottest deals

Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515DA_X515DA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics9.46% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive222% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515DA_X515DA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X515DA
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201019
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 08 '21 at 19:03
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Memory 69.1
1-Core 114
2-Core 204
72% 129 Pts
4-Core 387
8-Core 550
59% 469 Pts
64-Core 549
34% 549 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Asus(1043 1FBF) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.44.05
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
9.46% Terrible
Lighting 11.7
Reflection 9.4
Parallax 17.2
10% 12.8 fps
MRender 5.8
Gravity 15.4
Splatting 12.2
9% 11.1 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.46%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SPT256L2-2IAS7G2 256GB
189GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0901A3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 864 980 973 1025 1066 1087 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
222% Outstanding
Read 1,926
Write 1,010
Mixed 970
SusWrite 999
272% 1,226 MB/s
4K Read 44.2
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 29.1
167% 64.2 MB/s
DQ Read 875
DQ Write 718
DQ Mixed 511
461% 701 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 222%
Great: 222%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AM1P26KC8T1-BAAS 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.7% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 12.7
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 14.9
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 104
39% 104 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 15.5" 1280 720 BOE0903
Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515DA_X515DA Builds (Compare 49 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515DA_X515DA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback