Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R

Performance Results


Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	48.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	50.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R (all builds)
Memory	9.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100420
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 29 '17 at 11:37
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	IDN-User
Background CPU	100%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 930-$199 19,497 User benchmarks, average bench 64% Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	72% Very good	Memory 96.3 1-Core 48.4 2-Core 119 57% 88 Pts	4-Core 260 8-Core 378 40% 319 Pts	64-Core 376 23% 376 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 72% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% Sapphire(174B E347) Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 22.19.662.4 Performing below potential (75^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	48.9% Average	Lighting 59.4 Reflection 62.8 Parallax 78.6 48% 66.9 fps	MRender 66.3 Gravity 62.7 Splatting 56.2 50% 61.7 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 48.9% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 250GB-$251 41,998 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 97GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT06B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 5090 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 627 (B1) Unknown 98 98 17 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 47 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 72 (F1) Unknown 99 99 6405586520	50.6% Above average	Read 342 Write 135 Mixed 120 43% 199 MB/s	4K Read 24 4K Write 47 4K Mixed 11.9 77% 27.7 MB/s	DQ Read 181 DQ Write 111 DQ Mixed 27.9 52% 106 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 50.6% Great: 85%
Galax TA1C0240A 240GB 288 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 26GB free Firmware: SAFM22.3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 790 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 319 (A8) Unknown 100 100 23858866 (AA) Unknown 100 100 703 (AD) Unknown 100 100 65539 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 27 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 453	59.3% Above average	Read 374 Write 230 Mixed 255 63% 286 MB/s	4K Read 24 4K Write 47.7 4K Mixed 12.8 78% 28.1 MB/s	DQ Read 187 DQ Write 157 DQ Mixed 47.4 70% 131 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 59.3% Great: 103%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA331 2TB 22,636 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1.5TB free Firmware: JKAOA3NH Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 125 125 51579585060 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 635 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 678 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 329 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 636 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 636 (C2) HDA temperature 166 166 231929675812 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	68% Good	Read 113 Write 124 Mixed 90.8 82% 109 MB/s	4K Read 0.78 4K Write 1.45 4K Mixed 0.42 106% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6x2GB 38,297 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 6 of 6 slots used 12GB DIMM Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	62.5% Good	MC Read 23.5 MC Write 19.3 MC Mixed 24 64% 22.3 GB/s	SC Read 13.1 SC Write 13 SC Mixed 15.8 40% 14 GB/s	Latency 52.9 76% 52.9 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 62.5% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X58A-UD3R Builds (Compare 2,020 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R - $210

CPU
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	627x
Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples	406x
Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples	217x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	149x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	104x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	102x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	70x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	68x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	57x

RAM
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	343x
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	331x
3x4GBUnknownBench 42%, 39,448 samples	224x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $397

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16