Performance Results


Gaming 72% Battleship	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 64% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	85.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	293% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8750H 442,631 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	79.5% Very good	Memory 84.1 1-Core 124 2-Core 241 83% 150 Pts	4-Core 422 8-Core 484 59% 453 Pts	64-Core 958 59% 958 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 79.5% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile) 73,882 User benchmarks, average bench 72% Acer(1025 1243) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 2152 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.11 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	85.5% Excellent	Lighting 103 Reflection 137 Parallax 107 84% 115 fps	MRender 103 Gravity 106 Splatting 115 89% 108 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 85.5% Great: 82%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$96 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 635GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1527 1374 1342 1369 1332 1319 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	293% Outstanding	Read 2,356 Write 2,071 Mixed 1,425 SusWrite 1377 405% 1,807 MB/s	4K Read 57 4K Write 116 4K Mixed 79.5 249% 84 MB/s	DQ Read 939 DQ Write 696 DQ Mixed 785 596% 807 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 293% Great: 410%
Crucial MX500 2TB-$155 44,787 User benchmarks, average bench 108% 725GB free Firmware: M3CR023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 433 440 423 433 425 434 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 486 Write 426 Mixed 375 SusWrite 431 97% 429 MB/s	4K Read 31.2 4K Write 77.9 4K Mixed 38.8 138% 49.3 MB/s	DQ Read 381 DQ Write 318 DQ Mixed 284 231% 328 MB/s
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 125%
HFS256GD9MNE-6200A 256GB 1,347 User benchmarks, average bench 190% 35GB free Firmware: 40000E00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 646 649 547 467 312 392 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	135% Outstanding	Read 1,230 Write 373 Mixed 516 SusWrite 502 144% 655 MB/s	4K Read 37.5 4K Write 59.6 4K Mixed 39.3 139% 45.5 MB/s	DQ Read 514 DQ Write 60 DQ Mixed 111 126% 228 MB/s
Poor: 135% ↑ This bench: 135% Great: 225%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR26D4S9S8MH-8 859B BLS16G4S26BFSD.16FD ACR26D4S9S8MH-8 859B BLS16G4S26BFSD.16FD 48GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 16384, 8192, 16384 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	71.7% Very good	MC Read 24.9 MC Write 28.9 MC Mixed 22.8 73% 25.5 GB/s	SC Read 14.5 SC Write 24 SC Mixed 25.2 61% 21.2 GB/s	Latency 73.2 55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 71.7% Great: 79%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	7	5	60	17.2"	1536 841	AUO109B

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 56%

Gunboat

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 49%

Yacht

GPU
GTX 1070 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 72%, 73,882 samples	579x
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	3x

SSD
HFS256GD9MNE-6200A 256GBBench 190%, 1,347 samples	51x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $96Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	40x
THNSN5512GPU7 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBToshibaBench 160%, 14,022 samples	39x

RAM
ACR26D4S9S8MH-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 77%, 6,230 samples	128x
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 74%, 28,425 samples	109x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 71,691 samples	60x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16